Hi Eric:
The article you reference
http://phys.org/news/2013-04-quarks-dictate-proton.html
was also included in my original posting… perhaps you should read the entire
thread?
I for one would be interested in hearing other more knowledgeable people’s
opinions on the point of my posting, which is that what is lacking in
modern/mainstream atomic/nuclear physics is a physical model… HOW does one
explain WHY we see certain *specific* observations like I pointed out in the
original posting…
LENR is searching for a theoretical model, and it is not going to be found
‘inside the box’…
-Mark Iverson
From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now!
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
The only way I can understand an operation of this type is to assume that the
nuclei are connected electro magnetically to a strong degree. Maybe entangled
would work, but the coupling would need to be strong. And if entangled, a very
large number of resonators would need this coupling to share the load
adequately.
Dave, while we're taking bets, let me add in mine -- about gammas, my bet
agrees largely with Jones's and yours. The important detail is that gammas
only occur via secondary reactions.
<deleted>
Eric
[1] http://phys.org/news/2013-04-quarks-dictate-proton.html
