But then again, anyone who would invest in the Papp scam will believe almost anything, so why bother with facts?
As bad as I am, I don't believe in the *hydrino.* ** It’s time to winnow the wheat from the chaff. Some of these old and generally disregarded LENR theories need to be discarded into the dustbin of history. Yes, there has been lots of money wasted on them, But it is never to late to do the right thing. So let’s cut the loss and redirect to something real. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Axil Axil > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9h8zOKTZ6Y&playnext=1&list=PLFFCADC77D7CACD > F8&feature=results_main > They say seeing is believing... > The information used in my post came from this series of > videos showing some Mills powder experiments. > Should I believe you or my eyes. > > You should read the complete literature, first - and not > assume that any one video represents Mills' life's work. No one said that > there were no BLP powder experiments, only that the effect does not require > powder. In fact, most BLP papers are not dependent on powder. You stated > that the effect required powder because you did not read the literature and > are ignorant of most of his work. > But then again, anyone who would invest in the Papp scam > will believe almost anything, so why bother with facts? >
