Even if fraud is highly unlikely, didn't Essen make a technically erroneous claim?
Harry On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:04 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > It is like a bad nightmare; it keeps coming back again and again. I > suppose this is what the skeptics are left hanging on too since all the > evidence is strongly against them. When will they finally realize that > Rossi may have something? Who expects to see Mary, Cude or any of the > others apologize when the proof finally reaches beyond their bar? My bet > is they will hide away and change their fake names to avoid the issue. > > Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 1:55 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Face-Palm moment: Essen et al did it again! [Abd's open > letter] > > > *From:* Paul Breed** > > Ø In past jobs I've both designed and used power meters and I would > have to agree that if one is attempting to do fraud then putting DC bias on > an AC wall socket would be one possible way to do this… This fraud is > easily detected ... so it would be a risky thing to do.... > > Yes - I think this highlights the major issue. A fraudster could have > fooled experts if the risk of getting caught was ignored. But even then … > why? Rossi can never benefit to any great degree unless the device works. > He has already sold licenses including the US license and several others. > There is nothing to gain by a fraud now - other than a few extra months of > a “data holiday”. > > Sooner or later, his licensees will demand real data, or someone will call > in the FBI, as happened in the Rohner Papp engine fraud. It pretty simple. > > Either Rossi is a twisted ego-maniac willing to risk everything, including > his personal freedom- on a scam, or else there is something extremely > important to be had in understanding this device. > > We have beat this dead horse into a pink slime and 4 horse-shoes, no? > > Jones >
