Just when we booted one troll out of the saloon, MY gets reincarnated as BS... which so aptly describes what she/he spews...
-Mark -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 6:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Anyone willing to make a bet the eCat is not real? You go, girl! On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:41 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe that Essen and Levi were not skeptical, independent > investigators and that Rossi had plenty of opportunity to rig the test > or, less likely, they made optimistic measurements. > > That seems more probable to me then that this narcissistic fool has > discovered the solution that will change the future for everyone on > planet earth. > > That being said, I'd probably take the other side of the bet if > someone gave me 30-1 odds > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Rossi, however, I am willing to bet is a dangerous fool that >>> undermines the LENR community and its credibility. >> >> >> Rossi is not the issue any more. You are betting that Focardi, Levi >> and the other six are gullible fools who know nothing about how to do >> experiments. You are wrong about that. Their paper proves they know >> what they are doing. >> >> The paper by Ericsson & Pomp and the comments by people such as >> Shanahan at Forbes prove that the skeptics do not have a leg to stand >> on. They cannot think of a single valid objection to the Levi paper. >> If they could, they would. If YOU could, you would, instead of >> flailing around with these absurd arguments that people who know >> nothing about research should by magic ESP know all about. Ask >> yourself: What are E&P saying? That Levi should have built his own IR >> camera from scratch instead of using a commercial one and comparing >> it to a thermocouple. Is that really the kind of argument you want to >> hang your hat on? Do you really believe those nitwits?!? Have you >> ever read more absurd arguments in you life? (Okay go read Morrison >> versus Fleischmann . . . and you will.) >> >> Or take Shanahan's argument that he will not believe the thermocouple >> tracked the IR camera until he sees every single data point. Being >> told "it stayed within two degrees" is somehow magically not >> informative enough for him. Don't you see that he is making excuses >> and evading the issue? And making a fool of himself! >> >> - Jed >> >
