Ahhh, action. I love it! A peer reviewed publication, that's very interesting. I think we'll need to define which publications that might be, but other than that I'm in if you are.
As for someone to hold it, maybe we can post on intrade.freeforums.org for someone to hold it. Or who knows, maybe someone here might hold it (Paypal?) Glad to see you around! Really really miss intrade (obviously!) On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Blaze. I'm very pleased to see you posting here on Vortex. You > may remember me on Intrade as ko, the guy who kept posting Cold Fusion > articles. And I won quite a bit of money when the contract I posted was > verified by Carl. > > So, yes. I'm very interested in such a bet. In particular I like the > 10:1 odds. But we need to find an unbiased 3rd party to hold the money > and make the decision. Who would that be, now that Intrade is defunct? > > Also, the parameters of the decision are different than I would settle > upon. I don't hold Gibbs all that high in esteem. > > Perhaps something like, the 7 scientists who verified the energy density > of the Ecat get their paper published in a peer reviewed publication? > > > > How I Made Money from Cold Fusion > Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ > views > Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo > http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:37 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> As a possible set of parameters to this bet: >> >> I'm willing to bet my 5000 against anyone's 500 that Mark Gibbs doesn't >> publish an article in Forbes this year that states he personally believes >> without a doubt that LENR+ is real and has a power density matching what >> Levi/Essen published (within some reasonable margin of error). >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, blaze spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is anyone willing here to bet me $$$ that the eCat will not be proven >>> this year? >>> >>> I'm open to discussing the parameters of this bet. Ideally we'd >>> mutually agree on a 3rd party to hold our money and be an impartial judge >>> as to who wins by EOY. >>> >>> Let me know. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Blaze. >>> >> >> >
