What about a bet on Defkalion?
2013/6/28 blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_ranking > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor > > How about using something like that? It has to have some minimum impact > factor? > > How about an impact factor of at least 15? > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ok, I posted it at the forum Intrade Gateway. We'll see if anyone is >> willing. >> >> >> >> http://intrade.freeforums.org/re-anyone-willing-to-make-a-bet-the-ecat-is-not-real-t31.html >> >> How would we come to an agreement on which publications are acceptable? >> I can see why you wouldn't want Journal of Nuclear Physics. But throwing >> out American Chemical Society? Where's the legitimate cutoff point? >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:03 PM, blaze spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ahhh, action. I love it! >>> >>> A peer reviewed publication, that's very interesting. I think we'll >>> need to define which publications that might be, but other than that I'm in >>> if you are. >>> >>> As for someone to hold it, maybe we can post on intrade.freeforums.orgfor >>> someone to hold it. Or who knows, maybe someone here might hold it >>> (Paypal?) >>> >>> Glad to see you around! Really really miss intrade (obviously!) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Blaze. I'm very pleased to see you posting here on Vortex. You >>>> may remember me on Intrade as ko, the guy who kept posting Cold Fusion >>>> articles. And I won quite a bit of money when the contract I posted was >>>> verified by Carl. >>>> >>>> So, yes. I'm very interested in such a bet. In particular I like the >>>> 10:1 odds. But we need to find an unbiased 3rd party to hold the money >>>> and make the decision. Who would that be, now that Intrade is defunct? >>>> >>>> Also, the parameters of the decision are different than I would settle >>>> upon. I don't hold Gibbs all that high in esteem. >>>> >>>> Perhaps something like, the 7 scientists who verified the energy >>>> density of the Ecat get their paper published in a peer reviewed >>>> publication? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> How I Made Money from Cold Fusion >>>> Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ >>>> views >>>> Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo >>>> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:37 PM, blaze spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> As a possible set of parameters to this bet: >>>>> >>>>> I'm willing to bet my 5000 against anyone's 500 that Mark Gibbs >>>>> doesn't publish an article in Forbes this year that states he personally >>>>> believes without a doubt that LENR+ is real and has a power density >>>>> matching what Levi/Essen published (within some reasonable margin of >>>>> error). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, blaze spinnaker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is anyone willing here to bet me $$$ that the eCat will not be proven >>>>>> this year? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm open to discussing the parameters of this bet. Ideally we'd >>>>>> mutually agree on a 3rd party to hold our money and be an impartial judge >>>>>> as to who wins by EOY. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Blaze. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
