Ouch! You got me!
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:15 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>wrote: > Just when we booted one troll out of the saloon, MY gets reincarnated as > BS... which so aptly describes what she/he spews... > > -Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 6:48 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Anyone willing to make a bet the eCat is not real? > > You go, girl! > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:41 PM, blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > I believe that Essen and Levi were not skeptical, independent > > investigators and that Rossi had plenty of opportunity to rig the test > > or, less likely, they made optimistic measurements. > > > > That seems more probable to me then that this narcissistic fool has > > discovered the solution that will change the future for everyone on > > planet earth. > > > > That being said, I'd probably take the other side of the bet if > > someone gave me 30-1 odds > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Rossi, however, I am willing to bet is a dangerous fool that > >>> undermines the LENR community and its credibility. > >> > >> > >> Rossi is not the issue any more. You are betting that Focardi, Levi > >> and the other six are gullible fools who know nothing about how to do > >> experiments. You are wrong about that. Their paper proves they know > >> what they are doing. > >> > >> The paper by Ericsson & Pomp and the comments by people such as > >> Shanahan at Forbes prove that the skeptics do not have a leg to stand > >> on. They cannot think of a single valid objection to the Levi paper. > >> If they could, they would. If YOU could, you would, instead of > >> flailing around with these absurd arguments that people who know > >> nothing about research should by magic ESP know all about. Ask > >> yourself: What are E&P saying? That Levi should have built his own IR > >> camera from scratch instead of using a commercial one and comparing > >> it to a thermocouple. Is that really the kind of argument you want to > >> hang your hat on? Do you really believe those nitwits?!? Have you > >> ever read more absurd arguments in you life? (Okay go read Morrison > >> versus Fleischmann . . . and you will.) > >> > >> Or take Shanahan's argument that he will not believe the thermocouple > >> tracked the IR camera until he sees every single data point. Being > >> told "it stayed within two degrees" is somehow magically not > >> informative enough for him. Don't you see that he is making excuses > >> and evading the issue? And making a fool of himself! > >> > >> - Jed > >> > > > >
