I posted that the Impact Factor looked meaningless. I can't see if reasonable journals have a factor of 1, or 10 , or 100 or XYZ. There was never an answer to my post.
Kevin O'Malley<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22Kevin+O%27Malley%22> Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:53:40 -0700<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20130628> So far I can't get a handle on what Impact Factor really is. Reuters charges for their information. I need to see where various journals are in this ranking, such as Naturewieessen, American Chemical Society, Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Physics Letters A, Journal of Nuclear Physics,Nature, Journal of Electrochemistry and various other journals. In particular, I would like to know the rankings of the journals mentioned on page 18 in this paper from Jed Rothwell's LENR-CANR.org website: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:54 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ***I accepted your original offer of 10:1. But you are not a man of your >> word. >> > > Dude, you and I both know those bets are not forever. New information > arrives which forces us all to adjust our probabilities. > > BUT! > > If you still want to go with the original bet at 10:1 where the arvix > report must be published in a journal of impact factor > 15 (as I stated), > I'll take your money though. >
