Don't the particle sizes and shapes vary all over the map in a normal mass of 
the material?  This would defeat any process that depends upon  the size being 
exact.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 4:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis?


This resonance must be related to maximum size of the nickel micro-particles as 
related to blackbody resonance.



On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

137C must be an experimentally well measured parameter. It must also correspond 
to a sharp resonance condition.




On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

Axil,


I suspect that you are reading too much into the temperature measurement.  The 
motion of the individual atoms varies over quite a range at a given 
temperature.  For this reason, I am inclined to believe that Curie temperature 
might be important if magnetic effects are a key, but any special resonance at 
137C seems to be a long stretch.


It is not entirely evident that the Debye temperature matters in this situation.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>

Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 1:49 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis?




The magnetic nature of nickelwould interfere with the production of nano-vortex 
anapole fields.
 
 
The ability of nickel to affectnano-magnetism must be removed by getting nickel 
above the Curie temperature.
 
 
 
Dipole oscillations are thepowerhouse that feeds energy into vortex current 
production. The stronger theDipole oscillations become, the stronger that the 
vortex currents will become.
 
 
Through the application of heat,the nickel micro particles power the LENR 
process through stimulating Dipole oscillations.  This heat energy is 
transferred to the dipolesmost efficiently at or above the Debye temperature.
 
 
Also, 137C is the blackbody resonantfrequency for micro-particles at about 6 
microns. 
 
 
 
I bet when Defkalion and Rossiadd the nanowire covering to the 5 micron nickel 
micro-powder, the size of thoseprocessed particles will be ideal for a 137C 
blackbody resonance.




On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:

Does that favor the Debye temperature or Curie point view of the NAE?


Given your prior posting of this video:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE



It would seem to point to the Debye temperature.





On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:


At the heart of the Nanoplasmonictheory of LENR, hot spots produce nano-sized 
magnetic vortexes that disruptnuclear structure.





On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:


To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye temperature 
of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in Ni-H.

OK, so now we have:


Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to Ni's Debye 
temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen -- the mixture 
being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen.



Areas of clarification needed:


Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? 

Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy specified so that 
the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized?



 





On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:






On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:


Erratum:  Debay -> Debye




On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:


Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused with hydrogen 
-- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen.



Areas of clarification needed:...


Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of the 
"nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the "nano" range the 
size of these particles should sit?






"Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify.


See pages 14-16 of:
 http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf




























Reply via email to