This resonance must be related to maximum size of the nickel micro-particles as related to blackbody resonance.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > 137C must be an experimentally well measured parameter. It must also > correspond to a sharp resonance condition. > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Axil, >> >> I suspect that you are reading too much into the temperature >> measurement. The motion of the individual atoms varies over quite a range >> at a given temperature. For this reason, I am inclined to believe that >> Curie temperature might be important if magnetic effects are a key, but any >> special resonance at 137C seems to be a long stretch. >> >> It is not entirely evident that the Debye temperature matters in this >> situation. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 1:49 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? >> >> *The magnetic nature of nickel would interfere with the production of >> nano-vortex anapole fields.* >> * * >> * * >> *The ability of nickel to affect nano-magnetism must be removed by >> getting nickel above the Curie temperature.* >> * * >> * * >> * * >> *Dipole oscillations are the powerhouse that feeds energy into vortex >> current production. The stronger the Dipole oscillations become, the >> stronger that the vortex currents will become.* >> * * >> * * >> *Through the application of heat, the nickel micro particles power the >> LENR process through stimulating Dipole oscillations. This heat energy >> is transferred to the dipoles most efficiently at or above the Debye >> temperature.* >> * * >> * * >> *Also, 137C is the blackbody resonant frequency for micro-particles at >> about 6 microns. * >> * * >> * * >> * * >> *I bet when Defkalion and Rossi add the nanowire covering to the 5 >> micron nickel micro-powder, the size of those processed particles will be >> ideal for a 137C blackbody resonance.* >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Does that favor the Debye temperature or Curie point view of the NAE? >>> >>> Given your prior posting of this video: >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE >>> >>> It would seem to point to the Debye temperature. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> *At the heart of the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR, hot spots produce >>>> nano-sized magnetic vortexes that disrupt nuclear structure.* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain >>>>>> in >>>>>> Ni-H. >>>>>> >>>>> OK, so now we have: >>>>> >>>>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to >>>>> Ni's Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen >>>>> -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>>>> >>>>> Areas of clarification needed: >>>>> >>>>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>>>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>>>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry >>>>>>>> of the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in >>>>>>>> the "nano" >>>>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>>>> >>>>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
