Roberson and you keep going on about 137C but this is neither the Debye temperature (~178C) nor is it the Curie point of Nickel (~354C).
What is it called? And why do you keep going on about it when no one else mentions it? On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > *The magnetic nature of nickel would interfere with the production of > nano-vortex anapole fields.* > > * * > > * * > > *The ability of nickel to affect nano-magnetism must be removed by > getting nickel above the Curie temperature.* > > * * > > * * > > * * > > *Dipole oscillations are the powerhouse that feeds energy into vortex > current production. The stronger the Dipole oscillations become, the > stronger that the vortex currents will become.* > > * * > > * * > > *Through the application of heat, the nickel micro particles power the > LENR process through stimulating Dipole oscillations. This heat energy > is transferred to the dipoles most efficiently at or above the Debye > temperature.* > > * * > > * * > > *Also, 137C is the blackbody resonant frequency for micro-particles at > about 6 microns. * > > * * > > * * > > * * > > *I bet when Defkalion and Rossi add the nanowire covering to the 5 micron > nickel micro-powder, the size of those processed particles will be ideal > for a 137C blackbody resonance.* > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Does that favor the Debye temperature or Curie point view of the NAE? >> >> Given your prior posting of this video: >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE >> >> It would seem to point to the Debye temperature. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *At the heart of the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR, hot spots produce >>> nano-sized magnetic vortexes that disrupt nuclear structure.* >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in >>>>> Ni-H. >>>>> >>>> OK, so now we have: >>>> >>>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to Ni's >>>> Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen -- the >>>> mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>>> >>>> Areas of clarification needed: >>>> >>>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of >>>>>>> the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the >>>>>>> "nano" >>>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>>> >>>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>>> >>>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
