Do you see evidence that 137 C is such a sharp resonance? The various atoms are moving randomly about while the average velocity is equivalent to 137 in this special case. Even when the net average temperature is 150 C, many atoms are moving at the velocity expected to be seen by an atom at 137. Why would we suspect that those at only 137 are important?
If you were driving the material with a sound wave that happened to be at exactly 137, then a high Q resonance at that exact frequency could be strongly excited. I have not seen this process so far. Am I missing something important? The thermal energy appearing at the 137C equivalent is small when compared to an intentional source. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 4:52 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? 137C must be an experimentally well measured parameter. It must also correspond to a sharp resonance condition. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: Axil, I suspect that you are reading too much into the temperature measurement. The motion of the individual atoms varies over quite a range at a given temperature. For this reason, I am inclined to believe that Curie temperature might be important if magnetic effects are a key, but any special resonance at 137C seems to be a long stretch. It is not entirely evident that the Debye temperature matters in this situation. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 1:49 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:NiH NAE Synopsis? The magnetic nature of nickelwould interfere with the production of nano-vortex anapole fields. The ability of nickel to affectnano-magnetism must be removed by getting nickel above the Curie temperature. Dipole oscillations are thepowerhouse that feeds energy into vortex current production. The stronger theDipole oscillations become, the stronger that the vortex currents will become. Through the application of heat,the nickel micro particles power the LENR process through stimulating Dipole oscillations. This heat energy is transferred to the dipolesmost efficiently at or above the Debye temperature. Also, 137C is the blackbody resonantfrequency for micro-particles at about 6 microns. I bet when Defkalion and Rossiadd the nanowire covering to the 5 micron nickel micro-powder, the size of thoseprocessed particles will be ideal for a 137C blackbody resonance. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: Does that favor the Debye temperature or Curie point view of the NAE? Given your prior posting of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE It would seem to point to the Debye temperature. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: At the heart of the Nanoplasmonictheory of LENR, hot spots produce nano-sized magnetic vortexes that disruptnuclear structure. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in Ni-H. OK, so now we have: Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to Ni's Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. Areas of clarification needed: Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: Erratum: Debay -> Debye On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. Areas of clarification needed:... Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the "nano" range the size of these particles should sit? "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. See pages 14-16 of: http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf
