I suspect the biggest impact will be on such uneconomical (and highly
polluting) energy sources such as the Oil Sands in Canada.   Buying long
term put options on those seems like a smart play (with appropriate
inflation hedges).

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:10 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rossi claims that the total usage of nickel by LENR devices will be small
> compared to the current demand.  Couple this extra small demand with a long
> delay before large production and you observe what is happening in the
> market.  LENR should have a minor effect unless psychology boosts
> expectations.
>
>  Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blaze spinnaker <[email protected]>
> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 8:18 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re-adjusting odds on Rossi/Defkalion being real lower,
> now ~27%
>
>  "What part of the analysis am I getting wrong?"
>
>  The problem with futures is storage fees tend to overwhelm price
> movements.  Plus the nickel promised by those futures might not even be the
> type of nickel you can use for LENR.
>
>  If you were going to use the market, I'd look more at nickel miners who
> be well situated to pull out and refine the type of nickel needed for these
> devices.
>
>  Of course, another possibility may be that LENR isn't real so the market
> is ignoring it.
>
>
>

Reply via email to