On 6/10/2013 12:18 AM, Craig wrote:
The input power is not simply heat. The primary component is some type of electrical oscillator; and I don't think we've been told what that is. Craig
Maybe it takes something to ignite it, but the fact that the COP is not fixed at 6 but can be varied to infinity (at thermal run-away) indicates that the oscillator thing is not required for continuing operation once the reaction gets going.

On 6/10/2013 1:00 AM, David Roberson wrote:
You need to understand the complexity of Rossi's ECAT in order to see how your last paragraph will not work. His ECAT is either heading toward thermal run away ...
If it is capable of true thermal run-away, then it can simply be held on that knife edge - neither being allowed to run-away, or cool down, with a control system. This should be just as easy as keeping an inverted pendulum vertical against its continual tendency to fall one way or the other - an exercise done by virtually every student of control engineering. (In fact there is a continual small oscillation about the balance point, the level of which depends on the noise floor of the primary sensor and the closed loop bandwidth. But to all intents and purposes it simply sits stably in a continual state of being about to fall over.)
Also, it is not such a simple task to put together a system that is self running.
As I understand it, the system already self-runs. The problem is that it is dominated by positive feedback that makes it either want to run-away if it gets too hot or cool down if it gets too cold. Simply wrapping a negative feedback control system around it to counteract the positive and keep it at the right temperature solves this problem.

You might ask yourself why the reactors in Japan had such a hard time when the input power was interrupted by the Tsunami. ...
I am not suggesting the power for the control system and cooling fan be derived from the heat output! They should be powered from the mains in the normal manner. I can't imagine any sceptic being fool enough to suggest that the reactor was being kept red-hot by the blast of cold air blowing over it!

Many of us have issues with his demonstrations, but the evidence that he has something functioning is strong.
I felt the evidence was strong also, but as years go by and a self-runner (which should be as easy as adding an off-the-shelf temperature controller) is never demonstrated - one really begins to wonder why not!

Reply via email to