The July 23 test was a condensed one. Two days before its complete Protocol was published and the test was done according to tht Protocol and all the parameters were attained,as promised. It had to adjusted to the program of ICCF-18, so in some sense it had to be a minimalist test.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:17 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/10/2013 7:15 AM, Craig wrote: > >> On 10/05/2013 02:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> ...if the COP is not fixed at 6 but can be varied to infinity (at >>> thermal run-away) then the oscillator thing is not required for continuing >>> operation once the reaction gets going. >>> >> Not according to Defkalion. During the July demonstration, they were >> saying that during their normal tests, they shut down the heater and keep >> the thing running solely by the oscillator. >> > You have not proved your point. Maybe the oscillator provides enough > power (and it must provide some) when close to run-away that they no longer > need bulk extra heat from the heater. If the COP can be pushed to high > values by going to higher temperatures then I think this *proves* positive > feedback from temperature. If this is the case then you do not need the > oscillator. > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
