Fran, What I am really trying to say is that if you hang around close to the surface/horizon of vacuum/black hole/zpe/dark matter (whatever you want to call it) expect more radiation/decay, which ionizes you at a faster rate - like catalysis that speeds up reactions that you are describing and I agree with. If you can protect yourself from the radiation/flux then yes, you will age slower (the surface/shields of your ship will have to protect you...) But I think that is the same on Earth. If we can protect ourselves from ionizing radiation around us, we will all age slower. Problem is, our gravitational flux (of entropy to the Earth's center) and due to weather(vacuum) disturbances they are aging all of us at a similar rate over 80 or so obits...and we decay. Human's half life is around 24 years or so (actually probably less but our bodies replace damaged cells all of the time or we would all be dead quicker).
Best way I can explain it. Trying to separate all of the fusion/fission reactions occurring near the surface of the quantum vacuum "foam" is like separating gnat shit from pepper...:) But it is important and I agree with the overall direction of the discussion. If the core of the Earth, Sun, Gas Giant Planets, ETC. are curled up vacuum orbifolds with decaying firewalls and our weather disturbances are vacuum and that "cosmic string" I think was photographed from ISON on Thanksgiving day is vacuum then DUDES, WE ARE THE 5% IMMERSED IN THE 95% QUANTUM VACUUM FOAM made up of vacuum branes and strings all around us. Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:00 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not convinced time even exists, you will have to find one of those > younger twins to convince me. I think time is something wives made up to > let husbands know they are late. Catalysis is a sign of increased > ionization energy to make a reaction go forward, which makes sense it would > show up in the nooks and crannies where space is shredded closer to the > vacuum firewall due to emf > > I am with you on the space warping stuff. > > > > On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Frank roarty wrote: > >> ChemE, you said [snip] Less gravity, less decay. The closer you get to >> the firewall surface of a "black hole" or vacuum, the faster you decay due >> to the intense EMF/radiation [/snip]. You got this backwards. The paradox >> twin approaching the speed of light or equivalently deep in a gravity well >> slows down in time from our perspective. We grow old and it is our grand >> children who then welcome back the still young twin back to earth upon his >> return. Just like the Paradox twin a radioactive gas on board the same >> spaceship would remains blissfully unaware of time dilation and would have >> an “extended” half life from our earth bound perspective of measurements >> made before and after the trip which is perfectly acceptable under SR and >> has been reported to a lesser extent along with anomalous “cold” by >> researchers in the past. The more familiar claims of anomalous radioactive >> decay have been for “reduced” half life and anomalous heat. I predict these >> anomalous decay rates will be found much more frequently now that we know >> to look for them and will become a powerful tool in unlocking the secret >> behind LENR and proper understanding of Casimir effect and catalysis. The >> accelerated decay rate you mention does apply to radioactive gas migrating >> thru regions of Casimir geometry because restricting virtual particles in a >> cavity results in a negative pressure relative to us in the macro world >> outside the cavity, and that difference can be just as extreme as the >> relationship we accept in SR for the paradox twin without the need for near >> light speed velocity or equivalent gravity wells. In this case we outside >> the cavity become the Twin that remains young and slow down in time from >> the perspective of a tiny observer in the cavity, Not that it is all time >> dilation, CHANGE in geometry is actually the dominant factor in catalytic >> action, If the cavity were constant geometry like mirrors manufactured to >> produce Casimir plates for lab experiments there would only be catalytic >> action around the plate perimeters like the measurements by Chen at Purdue >> where catalytic action was only found to occur at the openings and defect >> regions of a nanotube. It is this dynamic feature that becomes multiplied >> in the tapestry of a skeletal catalyst or nano powders where the constant >> change in geometry changes the dilation rate and compounds the reaction >> rate from our perspective. I think gas ages more rapidly in a catalyst and >> it is only recently that these half life anomalies are starting to be >> investigated. >> >> Fran >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:50 AM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:More versatile Maxwell's demons >> >> >> >> I agree it points back to "TIME", but if the decay rate changes within >> space around the vacuum, what is time really? I see it as an increase in >> entropy due to decay rate which appears variable due to vacuum >> condentration. ie. "we are not getting older in time, we are decaying >> along with the space around us", Entropic gravity sees to it. Less gravity, >> less decay. The closer you get to the firewall surface of a "black hole" or >> vacuum, the faster you decay due to the intense EMF/radiation - it has to >> convert you to entropy first before it can suck you in. That is why I >> think if we leave Earth and can protect ourselves from decaying vacuum, we >> can live longer, ie. more "obits" >> >> >> >> The gravity we sense is really the quantum vacuum entanglement of entropy >> flowing to a black hole (6-D toridal vacuum brane at the center of the >> Earth). Our weather disturbances are created from local increases in >> vacuum (creating low pressure, ionization, condensing, precipitation) >> within our gaseous atmosphere which gradually decays space around it and it >> is also decaying. >> >> >> >> We are in a cosmic washing machine (very foamy- lots of bubbles, strings >> of all different energies) and space is constantly emerging and decaying >> around us. Life is boring otherwise :) >> >> >> >> I think we are saying the same thing. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Frank roarty <fr...@roarty.biz> wrote: >> >> Well, yes I agree see >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131205142218.htm on >> wormholes, >> entanglement and the effect on quarks as basis for a global gravitation >> theory and spooky action at a distance. Teleportation and instantaneous >> communication between Bob and Alice thru entanglement. Although the paper >> only deals with subatomic particles my posit is that the quantum effects >> of >> Casimir geometry segregate vacuum density regions inside vs exterior >> surfaces such that this same effect scales up or down - dynamic changes in >> gravity breaking the isotropy and relativistic effects leading to decay >> rate >> anomalies without near C velocity. If the current radioactive decay rate >> anomalies are due to the geometry and you consider the exposed to geometry >> duty factor vs the entire volume of gas being measured then the >> relativistic >> effects are actually much higher and being averaged down by circulation >> path >> and gas populating and pressurizing the less extreme geometry to >> facilitate >> the loading. I think LENR will lead to a new relativistic understanding of >> catalysis and Casimir effect. Getting back to a free energy self assembled >> Maxwellian demon this context would focus on the geometry segregating >> regions where vacuum wavelengths are either stretched or compressed from >> our >> perspective but negative or positive time dilation from a relativistic >> perspective at no energy cost! It is setting the stage for "sorting" gas >> atoms that are already harnessing zero point in the form of random >> motion.. >> no help sorting hot from cold but my posit remains that gas molecules >> formed >> in one time frame / fractional orbit oppose random motion to a different >> frame / fractional value which discounts the disassociation threshold. I >> like to visualize the covalent bonded orbitals of different fractional >> molecules as having their orbitals at different angles like butterfly >> wings >> where a normal gas molecule orbitals appear flat while an extreme 1/137 >> fractional molecule would be like the wings straight up parallel to each >> other and hence appearing smaller from our perspective above. The discount >> to disassociation threshold is only my pet theory but the relativistic >> hydrino paper from Naudts has been around since 05 and could be applied to >> recent threads about transmutation rates in these same regions... It all >> keeps pointing back to TIME. >> >> Fran >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com [mailto:pagnu...@htdconnect.com] >> >> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 12:59 PM >> To: >> >
