It has been shown that information can be converted into energy:
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428670/entangled-particles-break-classical-law-of-thermodynamics-say-physicists/ *Entangled Particles Break Classical Law of Thermodynamics, Say Physicists* The Ni/H reactor may be a system where entanglement is converted into energy. Here is are reasons why entanglement can be converted into energy. The preferred state of the plasmons exciton is entanglement. When plasmons are formed under the proper topological conditions, the plasmons entangle with extreme vigor. If plasmon entanglement is formed faster than an energy extracting de-coherence process can destroy it, might it not be possible that the Ni/H reactor can extract energy out of the Higgs field (aka vacuum energy) for free? On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > Fran and ChemE, > > I wish I could add some explanations, but all I can add are more examples > of (real or apparent?) anomalies and paradoxes seemingly related to > physical interactions and boundary effects. Perhaps of interest: > > Mystery of neutron-lifetime discrepancy deepens > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/dec/04/mystery-of-neutron-lifetime-discrepancy-deepens > > (Oscillating) non-exponential decays of unstable states > http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1896 > > Radioactive Decay Anomaly Finally Explained (Maybe) > - A long-standing puzzle over periodic oscillations in the decay of some > elements may have finally been solved, say physicists > > http://www.technologyreview.com/view/425731/radioactive-decay-anomaly-finally-explained-maybe/ > > And, I'm still not convinced that the explanations offered so far really > account for the fact that chiral molecules, like ammonia, insist on staying > in either their right-handed (|R>) or left-handed (|L>) states rather than > decaying to their lowest energy symmetric state (superposition |R>+|L>, > normalized, of course.) Somehow, the universe finds the superposition a > bit abhorrent. > > -- Lou Pagnucco > > > > ChemE wrote: > > Fran, > > > > What I am really trying to say is that if you hang around close to the > > surface/horizon of vacuum/black hole/zpe/dark matter (whatever you want > > to > > call it) expect more radiation/decay, which ionizes you at a faster rate > - > > like catalysis that speeds up reactions that you are describing and I > > agree > > with. If you can protect yourself from the radiation/flux then yes, you > > will age slower (the surface/shields of your ship will have to protect > > you...) But I think that is the same on Earth. If we can protect > > ourselves > > from ionizing radiation around us, we will all age slower. Problem is, > > our > > gravitational flux (of entropy to the Earth's center) and due to > > weather(vacuum) disturbances they are aging all of us at a similar rate > > over 80 or so obits...and we decay. Human's half life is around 24 years > > or so (actually probably less but our bodies replace damaged cells all of > > the time or we would all be dead quicker). > > > > Best way I can explain it. Trying to separate all of the fusion/fission > > reactions occurring near the surface of the quantum vacuum "foam" is like > > separating gnat shit from pepper...:) But it is important and I agree > with > > the overall direction of the discussion. If the core of the Earth, Sun, > > Gas Giant Planets, ETC. are curled up vacuum orbifolds with decaying > > firewalls and our weather disturbances are vacuum and that "cosmic > string" > > I think was photographed from ISON on Thanksgiving day is vacuum then > > DUDES, WE ARE THE 5% IMMERSED IN THE 95% QUANTUM VACUUM FOAM made up of > > vacuum branes and strings all around us. > > > > Stewart > > Darkmattersalot.com > > [...] > >
