Come to think of it, if a single photon were to remain trapped within a tiny cavity, it would loose energy and be converted into lower frequency photons as that occurred unless the cavity had no loss. If you consider that many photons could be trapped in the same hole together, energy loss should still occur. Would each behave individually and all slowly loose energy in synchronism? Would the loss be taken from one while the others remain intact? Classical analysis has not problem dealing with this situation since it would only be concerned with the total energy. That may be a more appropriate way to handle these cases.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Jan 24, 2014 12:47 am Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement If you remember, Milley discovered superconductivity in small cavities. He says that protons were in these cavities but who can tell really. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:42 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: I see what you mean Axil. Unless the nano cavity is a super conductor it should loose energy to resistive walls like a normal cavity resonator. In time, the total energy trapped in a normal cavity must decay to zero. Of course, a very high Q cavity could maintain much of the original photon energy for a long time. Is there evidence that the nano cavities that you describe are super conductive? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Jan 24, 2014 12:34 am Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement Mills may be mistaking nanoparticles for hydrinos. Nanoparticles can be excited by a single photon. That incoming excitation energy is relaxed by a broadband spectrum of many photons as the free electrons orbiting the surface of the nanoparticles reemit the energy of excitation. Broadband emission spectrum is a telltale sign of the presence of nanoparticles when the material is excited by a monochromatic photon source.. Reference, http://www2.hu-berlin.de/chemie/agrad/paper/2007/10.1088-0957-4484-18-35-355702.pdf These clusters exhibit an efficient white multiphoton-induced luminescence during NIR Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser excitation. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:54 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: Eric, the broadband emission of photons does seem a little problematic. I have come to expect the energy levels of atoms to be so well defined that accurate clocks are built using the transitions. Are you sure that you accurately understand the source of that radiation? It would seem more reasonable for the energy to be transferred as a well defined chunk that is accepted by the catalyst. The activity of the catalyst as a result of the transfer could be the source for the wide band radiation. This is just my way to justify the emissions. Mills may likely have a different opinion of the events. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Jan 23, 2014 10:06 pm Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Unless I'm mistaken, the reason for non-radiation is that there is a lower limit to radiation as a phenomenon. According to the presentation at zhydrogen [1], when the electron "spirals down" to a more redundant level, there is a broadband emission of photons. Presumably at least some photons are not trapped in this scenario. Assuming I haven't misunderstood an important point, is that claim incompatible with what you're saying here? Eric [1] http://zhydrogen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/BLP-presentation.pdf
