Eric, the broadband emission of photons does seem a little problematic. I have come to expect the energy levels of atoms to be so well defined that accurate clocks are built using the transitions. Are you sure that you accurately understand the source of that radiation? It would seem more reasonable for the energy to be transferred as a well defined chunk that is accepted by the catalyst. The activity of the catalyst as a result of the transfer could be the source for the wide band radiation.
This is just my way to justify the emissions. Mills may likely have a different opinion of the events. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Jan 23, 2014 10:06 pm Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Unless I'm mistaken, the reason for non-radiation is that there is a lower limit to radiation as a phenomenon. According to the presentation at zhydrogen [1], when the electron "spirals down" to a more redundant level, there is a broadband emission of photons. Presumably at least some photons are not trapped in this scenario. Assuming I haven't misunderstood an important point, is that claim incompatible with what you're saying here? Eric [1] http://zhydrogen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/BLP-presentation.pdf
