Mills may be mistaking nanoparticles for hydrinos. Nanoparticles can be
excited by a single photon. That incoming excitation energy is relaxed  by
a broadband spectrum of many  photons as the free electrons orbiting the
surface of the nanoparticles  reemit the energy of excitation.

Broadband emission spectrum is a telltale sign of the presence of
nanoparticles when the material is excited by a monochromatic photon
source..

Reference,

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/chemie/agrad/paper/2007/10.1088-0957-4484-18-35-355702.pdf

These clusters exhibit an efficient white multiphoton-induced luminescence
during NIR Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser excitation.


On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:54 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Eric, the broadband emission of photons does seem a little problematic.  I
> have come to expect the energy levels of atoms to be so well defined that
> accurate clocks are built using the transitions.  Are you sure that you
> accurately understand the source of that radiation?   It would seem more
> reasonable for the energy to be transferred as a well defined chunk that is
> accepted by the catalyst.  The activity of the catalyst as a result of the
> transfer could be the source for the wide band radiation.
>
>  This is just my way to justify the emissions.  Mills may likely have a
> different opinion of the events.
>
>  Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Walker <[email protected]>
> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, Jan 23, 2014 10:06 pm
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement
>
>   On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, the reason for non-radiation is that there is a lower
>> limit
>> to radiation as a phenomenon.
>
>
>  According to the presentation at zhydrogen [1], when the electron
> "spirals down" to a more redundant level, there is a broadband emission of
> photons.  Presumably at least some photons are not trapped in this
> scenario.  Assuming I haven't misunderstood an important point, is that
> claim incompatible with what you're saying here?
>
>  Eric
>
>
>  [1] http://zhydrogen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/BLP-presentation.pdf
>
>

Reply via email to