If you remember, Milley discovered superconductivity in small cavities. He says that protons were in these cavities but who can tell really.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:42 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > I see what you mean Axil. Unless the nano cavity is a super conductor it > should loose energy to resistive walls like a normal cavity resonator. In > time, the total energy trapped in a normal cavity must decay to zero. Of > course, a very high Q cavity could maintain much of the original photon > energy for a long time. > > Is there evidence that the nano cavities that you describe are super > conductive? > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Jan 24, 2014 12:34 am > Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement > > Mills may be mistaking nanoparticles for hydrinos. Nanoparticles can be > excited by a single photon. That incoming excitation energy is relaxed by > a broadband spectrum of many photons as the free electrons orbiting the > surface of the nanoparticles reemit the energy of excitation. > > Broadband emission spectrum is a telltale sign of the presence of > nanoparticles when the material is excited by a monochromatic photon > source.. > > Reference, > > > http://www2.hu-berlin.de/chemie/agrad/paper/2007/10.1088-0957-4484-18-35-355702.pdf > These clusters exhibit an efficient white multiphoton-induced > luminescence during NIR Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser excitation. > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:54 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Eric, the broadband emission of photons does seem a little problematic. >> I have come to expect the energy levels of atoms to be so well defined >> that accurate clocks are built using the transitions. Are you sure that >> you accurately understand the source of that radiation? It would seem >> more reasonable for the energy to be transferred as a well defined chunk >> that is accepted by the catalyst. The activity of the catalyst as a result >> of the transfer could be the source for the wide band radiation. >> >> This is just my way to justify the emissions. Mills may likely have a >> different opinion of the events. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thu, Jan 23, 2014 10:06 pm >> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Unless I'm mistaken, the reason for non-radiation is that there is a >>> lower limit >>> to radiation as a phenomenon. >> >> >> According to the presentation at zhydrogen [1], when the electron >> "spirals down" to a more redundant level, there is a broadband emission of >> photons. Presumably at least some photons are not trapped in this >> scenario. Assuming I haven't misunderstood an important point, is that >> claim incompatible with what you're saying here? >> >> Eric >> >> >> [1] http://zhydrogen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/BLP-presentation.pdf >> >> >
