Well, it was news to me.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Horse shit. You didn't change your views in those few days based upon > news. You changed it based upon your interactions here, during a time at > which there was no news. > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> We both used Intrade, Kevin. This is how it works. >> >> Changing news requires updating your priors constantly. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yeah, right. You first come onto Vortex-L giving 10:1 odds and then >>> quickly pull back. You're the one disconnected to reality. I wouldn't >>> care except for the fact that you took money off the table. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Kevin, you're very very confused about reality. I tend to avoid >>>> discussions with such people. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> STMicro has nothing to do with Rossi. >>>>> Cherokee stuff is all rumor, but at least it has something to do with >>>>> Rossi. >>>>> 3rd party reports in March -- he's been saying that all along, so why >>>>> does this suddenly mean an increase of 2%? >>>>> Defkalion has nothing to do with Rossi. >>>>> >>>>> As has been stated upthread, Blaze you're all over the map. You need >>>>> to sit down and generate your own internal idea of whether LENR is real. >>>>> Then for Rossi, there's a bifurcation. His ECat could be a real LENR >>>>> device but it might not ever be controllable enough to sell to industry. >>>>> So, yes, he's "real" but that isn't truly what you're getting at. >>>>> Basically, the independent report from ELFORSK by 7 independent scientists >>>>> PROVED that Rossi is "real" to anyone willing to honestly evaluate the >>>>> evidence, so this bloviating will be about something else. >>>>> >>>>> When you first started posting this kind of stuff, you offered me 10:1 >>>>> odds and within a matter of a couple of days you backtracked to 2:1 odds. >>>>> >>>>> In order to get money on the table you need to sweeten the pot. 2:1 >>>>> odds are almost not even worth it, especially seeing how you backtrack and >>>>> hide behind word usage, that kind of thing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is based on >>>>>> >>>>>> - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>>>>> - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>>>>> - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >>>>>> - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>>>>> >>>>>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. Could be >>>>>> updating this probability more frequently. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
