Watch the videos before commenting - they actually say that Rossi shouldn't be dismissed.
***That still doesn't make for any kind of connection between Rossi and these other developments. You're obviously confused. What you MEAN is that you're giving odds that LENR is Real, not necessarily that Rossi is real. In reality, I suspect you were looking for some suckers to pull into some intrade type bets, first by offering 10:1 odds as bait & Switch to 2:1 odds. 2:1 is about what ANY product going to market would face, let alone something as dicey as LENR, but the LENR fans would eat it up. That's my perception of what you have attempted here. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Watch the videos before commenting - they actually say that Rossi > shouldn't be dismissed. They seemed very credible to me, like someone who > had been working on the same problem and making slow progress over the > years. Nanor is also LENR+ if you scale it up properly. > > It also felt they were peer reviewing each other. I am awaiting the > Nanor tech with great excitement. Hopefully MFMP gets a hold of it soon. > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Rossi. Your entire assessment is >> littered with irrelevant items. >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos. >>> >>> >>> >>>
