Yeah, right. You first come onto Vortex-L giving 10:1 odds and then quickly pull back. You're the one disconnected to reality. I wouldn't care except for the fact that you took money off the table.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Kevin, you're very very confused about reality. I tend to avoid > discussions with such people. > > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> STMicro has nothing to do with Rossi. >> Cherokee stuff is all rumor, but at least it has something to do with >> Rossi. >> 3rd party reports in March -- he's been saying that all along, so why >> does this suddenly mean an increase of 2%? >> Defkalion has nothing to do with Rossi. >> >> As has been stated upthread, Blaze you're all over the map. You need to >> sit down and generate your own internal idea of whether LENR is real. Then >> for Rossi, there's a bifurcation. His ECat could be a real LENR device but >> it might not ever be controllable enough to sell to industry. So, yes, >> he's "real" but that isn't truly what you're getting at. Basically, the >> independent report from ELFORSK by 7 independent scientists PROVED that >> Rossi is "real" to anyone willing to honestly evaluate the evidence, so >> this bloviating will be about something else. >> >> When you first started posting this kind of stuff, you offered me 10:1 >> odds and within a matter of a couple of days you backtracked to 2:1 odds. >> >> In order to get money on the table you need to sweeten the pot. 2:1 odds >> are almost not even worth it, especially seeing how you backtrack and hide >> behind word usage, that kind of thing. >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> This is based on >>> >>> - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>> - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>> - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >>> - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>> >>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. Could be >>> updating this probability more frequently. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
