The spin of the polariton produces the magnetic field in the same way that an iron magnet produces a magnetic field; that is, through spin alignment except that the half soliton has only one pole.
Think of the soliton as a very strong permanent magnet. Charge movement does not produce a current. There is no AC frequency and no RF involved. On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:13 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > You are describing a strange particle Axil. It is not clear as to > whether or not the magnetic field generated within the soliton is steady or > of an AC nature. Can you verify that a DC magnetic field is generated by > this type of ensemble? Why does the AC frequency of the trapped photon > not effect the field? I am not aware of any RF type of system that can > generate a DC field unless it is rectified by some means. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 9:59 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:a note from Dr. Stoyan Sargoytchev > > A polariton is a photon and an electron locked together in a pair. This > pair orbits around a cavity on its edge. The spin of all polaritons are > pointed such that the polariton ensemble produces a magnetic field at the > center of the soliton perpendicular to the circular polariton current > (whirlpool). This current is superconducting. When photons and electrons > enter into the soliton, they don't exit. By the way, polariton solitons are > used as a research tool to understand the behavior of astrophysical black > holes. > I believe that the magnetic field projections from the soliton screen the > charge of all fermions in the nucleus including the nucleus and all protons > in the neighborhood. When the nucleus and many di-protons pairs around it > reorganizes, gamma energy travels back on the magnetic field lines from the > soliton and the photons gain energy generating increase magnetic field > strengths going forward. The magnetic fields produced by such solitons can > get huge. > LeClair saw a soliton he produced eat through 6 feet of copper as it rode > on the surface of a copper rod. > > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:23 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > >> Perhaps I heard you this time! Would you expect the increased magnetic >> field created by these polaritons to then be able to cause more LENR >> activity in synchronization? >> >> I suppose I need to have a better understanding of the half soliton of >> polaritons that you mention. Where can I locate a straight forward >> description of them? >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 9:14 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:a note from Dr. Stoyan Sargoytchev >> >> David, >> >> A half soliton of polaritons can not only produce a magnetic field, it >> can thermalize gamma radiation to EUV and convert that radiation to more >> magnetic strength in a positive feed back loop. >> >> I will continue to repeat this until it gets through, >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:00 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >> >>> Bob, I was not thinking about Muon type cold fusion. I guess it >>> skipped my thoughts since I have been concentrating on nickel hydrogen >>> systems. It is interesting to see that you have been seeking some form of >>> interaction between the reactant atoms and a magnetic field since it makes >>> a great deal of sense that some direct interaction takes place between the >>> charged particles and the magnetic field that permeates the area around >>> them. If that field is intense enough, one might expect it to restrain the >>> motion of those charged particles by effectively offering them a medium to >>> 'push' against. >>> >>> A slow moving magnetic field of the sort that I understand DGT suggests >>> would be able to reach into every region of the active material, including >>> the nuclei. The relatively slow moving nature of the externally detected >>> remnant would be expected since the internally generated field passes >>> through an excellent metallic conductor. I also suspect that any locally >>> generated rapidly changing magnetic field variations would be absorbed by >>> nearby electrons in the lattice due to an induced 'E field' at their >>> location. >>> >>> How far into the metal lattice the rapid magnetic field variations >>> penetrate is of interest. It seems logical to assume that essentially all >>> of the electrons that intercept that field would get a kick from a nearby >>> fusion reaction. This process reminds me of how I visualize a magnetic >>> brake in operation. >>> >>> A few questions remain that I want answered. Is the large external >>> magnetic field reported by DGT real? Have they retracted that announcement >>> or do they continue to insist that it is reported accurately? >>> >>> If the field exists, my suspicion is that there is some interaction >>> between the powerful magnetic field and the individual NAE. How this gets >>> translated into a positive feedback effect escapes me at this time. I >>> anticipate a positive feedback system is generating this behavior because >>> of the nature of the field. There does not seem to be any known reason for >>> such a large field to be generated by the DGT device, and of course, it >>> begins as a small field. There likewise is no good explanation for the >>> LENR action either, so it seems like a logical conclusion to assume they >>> are connected in some manner. For example, a small local NAE allows a >>> fusion which results in the release of a significant local magnetic field >>> that interacts with its neighbors. This field induces some of them to join >>> in leading to additional LENR activity. The new fusions are somehow able >>> to add to the initial guiding field in a positive manner. Both increase >>> together to result in a significant amount of LENR activity and a large >>> total magnetic field. You do not observe one without the other being >>> present. Also, unless the parameters are correct allowing the coupling to >>> be sufficient, you do not observe a significant amount of LENR performance >>> or a significant external magnetic field. The requirement for the correct >>> positive feedback environment could easily explain the difficulty in >>> producing a working system. >>> >>> The above scenario represents my latest thinking. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> >>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 7:14 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:a note from Dr. Stoyan Sargoytchev >>> >>> Dave-- >>> >>> Muon induced cold fusion was known before the P-F effect was >>> demonstrated. >>> >>> I always assumed the magnetic field in the P-F effect was somehow >>> involved with the event. Pd has a large magnetic susceptibility and a >>> large electronic heat capacity associated with effectively heavy S band >>> electrons. The large B field inside the Pd metal would reduce the number >>> of possible quantum states for the deuterium particles and cause them to be >>> aligned, spin-wise, parallel or anti parallel to the local (internal) B >>> field. >>> >>> I have an idea about the synthesis of He from the deuterium that >>> involves the spin, angular momentum and transfer of residual energy via >>> spin coupling to the electronic structure of the lattice, assuming a >>> continuous "quantum connected" system. I have always thought that the He >>> formed in the process starts out as an excited He* with a high spin quantum >>> state and associated energy which is rapidly (instantaneously) released to >>> the lattice electrons (conserving angular momentum) and hence vibrational >>> phonons--heat. Linear momentum and kinetic energy is not involved in the >>> process. >>> >>> Also, apparently similar (perceived the same) physical phenomena have >>> differing causes--the issue is in what's apparent and what really is the >>> cause. I tend to agree with Axil. His comment that if you look deep >>> enough (the picture will make sense) is the basis for scientific >>> investigation. >>> >>> >>> Bob Cook (Stalecookie) (My first response to this blog.) >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> >>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> *Sent:* Monday, February 03, 2014 2:23 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a note from Dr. Stoyan Sargoytchev >>> >>> I agree with your approach Ed. I just wanted to point out that we >>> must not put on blinders if we make measurements that suggest that some >>> other reaction is taking place than the suspected one. It is prudent to >>> begin with the most likely concepts to explore and to keep our eyes wide >>> open for results that do not quite match our expectations. >>> >>> It would not come as a big surprise if eventually a few different >>> processes are identified. Time and experimentation will settle the issue >>> and it is premature to declare victory. >>> >>> For example, if you go back to the time before P&F there was no possible >>> way for cold fusion to occur according to what was known and the doors need >>> to remain open to new discoveries that might come from unexpected locals. >>> If the magnetic field reported by DGT turns out to be real, then a whole >>> new series of paths become possible. I have been considering the >>> application of positive feedback involving the interaction of a locally >>> powerful magnetic field and some form of nuclear fusion process that couple >>> into each other. A large scale version of this phenomena would not have >>> been possible to observe before Rossi or DGT had systems with adequate >>> power. The way nickel looses it gross magnetic characteristic once the >>> temperature reaches a threshold might allow the underlying process to >>> initiate. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >> >
