Jones, I think you are right and it is also responsible for a part of the normal background radiation here on Earth, which increases slightly during many storms, many of which I think are caused by an increase in local vacuum energy and not just hot and cold. We were born into a world where "space is not smooth". I think the Dirac sea is a stormy sea and we are "Riders on the Storm"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCJm0kNm-2Y On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Poser of the Day ... > > Cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is almost universally assumed > to > be the photon remnants which are left over from the "Big Bang" of > cosmology. > That assumption has more holes than Swiss cheese. Compounding one error in > another is the best that can be said for it. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background > > This Big-Bang explanation is by default essentially - but it makes no > logical sense in an unbounded (expanding) Universe that we should detect a > fairly uniform relic from 14 billion years ago, which is red-shifted to > such > an extreme degree. > > Another explanation for CMB dawned on me this morning. > > CMB could be ongoing "leakage" from the Dirac sea, instead of a > multi-billion year old relic of an event that probably never happened to > begin with. The more one thinks about it, even if one is not a contrarian > by > nature, the more appealing it can sound - and so far, the objections seem > fewer than the mainstream view (if you accept Dirac and question the Big > Bang). > > I was about to say that "you heard it first on Vortex" but a quick search > indicates that at least one other reference to a CMB <=> Dirac-sea > connection has turned up. > > > http://www.flinders.edu.au/science_engineering/caps/staff-postgrads/info/cah > ill-r/process-physics/<http://www.flinders.edu.au/science_engineering/caps/staff-postgrads/info/cahill-r/process-physics/> > > Not surprising that he is from Adelaide... > > > > > >
