David, I tend to think the core of the Earth as "dark matter", possibly a 6-D space vacuum toroid and dark energy to be all the vacuum energy the sun/other branes are spewing into space 24/7, which is accelerating as it leaves the solar brane(our solar wind accelerates) and some/much of it whizzes by earth(like when a CME misses Earth) and inflates/decays out in the cosmos and turns into things like comets and asteroids as the vacuum stuff decays back to baryonic matter. Sort of a inflating/decaying quantum braneworld scenario. with lots of high energy curled up stuff whizzing around making life short but interesting...
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:50 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is another interesting question to ponder. If dark matter interacts > with other dark matter, is that the source of dark energy? This thought is > along the lines of: Conservation of Dark Matter and Energy. E=M*c*c where > the M is dark matter and E is dark energy. > > If, as we appear to be considering, dark matter interacts very slowly > among itself and at least one of the results is CMB, could another effect > be the force that is driving the stars apart? As Jones seems to be > suggesting it would be quite useful if a method can be found to enhance > that conversion rate to power our world. It seems logical to believe that > there exists an enormous amount of energy that we so far have not tapped > which is currently expanding the universe. > > Has anyone seen a calculation of the total amount of energy contained in > the CMB? Since it propagates throughout the universe and is present to a > degree at every location, there must be a lot of it around. It would > appear that this trapped energy would love to find freedom of movement by > expanding the region that it occupies. This process should result in an > expansive force. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 4:25 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea? > > 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an > illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects > In addition to gravitational effects I think it is electromagnetic > (think magnetosphere) and weakly ionizing/decaying 3-space (think > ionosphere) and electromagnetic/lightning discharge during storms and > decaying and condensing surroundings creating protons and creating WATER > (think troposphere and low pressure weather disturbances).O2 + quantum > vacuum ionization energy --->2O-- + 4H+ = 2H2O. If you ionize oxygen you > get nitrogen, which between the two make up most of the atmosphere. > 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter > Agreed > 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from the > Dirac sea > Agreed. I think the residual radiation changes because the Dirac Sea > varies in vacuum concentration - it is stringy and brany. I think the Sun > is vomiting this stuff at us and "leaking branes", i.e. the Earth is > "pulling a vacuum" on the Sun. > Our oceans/water are really a result of our decayed/condensed quantum > gravity field. > I am still thinking the electromagnetic pulsed field from a magnetron or > klystron is possibly causing the Dirac sea to "leak" protons or > something...Maybe nature pulls positive charge from the vacuum to offset > the electromagnetic field from a Doppler to keep a balance? > I think it relates to the Doppler Shift. Dopplers signals get warped and > bent and are subject to anomolous clear air reflections all of the time. > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case >> for this premise: >> >> 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an >> illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects >> 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter >> 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from >> the Dirac sea >> >> Now comes the interesting part. Can this information, if valid, be put to >> use in alternative energy? >> >> One seemingly obvious way to proceed is to consider CMB as a “leak” of >> some kind. If it is a leak, then we want to increase the flow rate. >> >> There are many ways to increase the flow rate of various streams, some of >> which are applicable to microwave photons … so let the games begin… >> >> *From:* ChemE Stewart >> >> http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html >> *From:* David Roberson >> A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for >> the CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe >> and is supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large >> massive objects. I have long wondered how this congregation of material >> could occur in matter that has no way to release the gravitational energy >> by radiation as with normal matter. Perhaps the CMB is generated gradually >> by the condensation of the dark matter. >> Or … perhaps dark matter is another aspect of the Dirac Sea ? >> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0705/0705.2908.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
