Here is another interesting question to ponder. If dark matter interacts with other dark matter, is that the source of dark energy? This thought is along the lines of: Conservation of Dark Matter and Energy. E=M*c*c where the M is dark matter and E is dark energy.
If, as we appear to be considering, dark matter interacts very slowly among itself and at least one of the results is CMB, could another effect be the force that is driving the stars apart? As Jones seems to be suggesting it would be quite useful if a method can be found to enhance that conversion rate to power our world. It seems logical to believe that there exists an enormous amount of energy that we so far have not tapped which is currently expanding the universe. Has anyone seen a calculation of the total amount of energy contained in the CMB? Since it propagates throughout the universe and is present to a degree at every location, there must be a lot of it around. It would appear that this trapped energy would love to find freedom of movement by expanding the region that it occupies. This process should result in an expansive force. Dave -----Original Message----- From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014 4:25 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea? 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects In addition to gravitational effects I think it is electromagnetic (think magnetosphere) and weakly ionizing/decaying 3-space (think ionosphere) and electromagnetic/lightning discharge during storms and decaying and condensing surroundings creating protons and creating WATER (think troposphere and low pressure weather disturbances).O2 + quantum vacuum ionization energy --->2O-- + 4H+ = 2H2O. If you ionize oxygen you get nitrogen, which between the two make up most of the atmosphere. 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter Agreed 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from the Dirac sea Agreed. I think the residual radiation changes because the Dirac Sea varies in vacuum concentration - it is stringy and brany. I think the Sun is vomiting this stuff at us and "leaking branes", i.e. the Earth is "pulling a vacuum" on the Sun. Our oceans/water are really a result of our decayed/condensed quantum gravity field. I am still thinking the electromagnetic pulsed field from a magnetron or klystron is possibly causing the Dirac sea to "leak" protons or something...Maybe nature pulls positive charge from the vacuum to offset the electromagnetic field from a Doppler to keep a balance? I think it relates to the Doppler Shift. Dopplers signals get warped and bent and are subject to anomolous clear air reflections all of the time. On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: Taking all of thistogether, there seems to exist a prima facie case for this premise: 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is anillusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation fromthe Dirac sea Now comes the interestingpart. Can this information, if valid, be put to use in alternative energy? One seemingly obvious wayto proceed is to consider CMB as a “leak” of some kind. If it is a leak, then wewant to increase the flow rate. There are many ways toincrease the flow rate of various streams, some of which are applicable tomicrowave photons … so let the games begin… From:ChemE Stewart http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html From:David Roberson A thought just came to mewhile considering alternate explanations for the CMB. Dark matter isassumed to be distributed throughout the universe and is supposed to clumptogether around galaxy centers and other large massive objects. I havelong wondered how this congregation of material could occur in matter that hasno way to release the gravitational energy by radiation as with normalmatter. Perhaps the CMB is generated gradually by the condensation of thedark matter. Or … perhaps dark matteris another aspect of the Dirac Sea ? http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0705/0705.2908.pdf
