Could the dirac sea also explain the observed red shift? Harry
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case for > this premise: > > > > 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an > illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects > > 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter > > 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from the > Dirac sea > > > > Now comes the interesting part. Can this information, if valid, be put to > use in alternative energy? > > > > One seemingly obvious way to proceed is to consider CMB as a “leak” of > some kind. If it is a leak, then we want to increase the flow rate. > > > > There are many ways to increase the flow rate of various streams, some of > which are applicable to microwave photons … so let the games begin… > > > > *From:* ChemE Stewart > > > > http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html > > *From:* David Roberson > > A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the > CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe and > is supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large massive > objects. I have long wondered how this congregation of material could > occur in matter that has no way to release the gravitational energy by > radiation as with normal matter. Perhaps the CMB is generated gradually by > the condensation of the dark matter. > > Or … perhaps dark matter is another aspect of the Dirac Sea ? > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0705/0705.2908.pdf > > > > > > > >
