1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects
In addition to gravitational effects I think it is electromagnetic (think magnetosphere) and weakly ionizing/decaying 3-space (think ionosphere) and electromagnetic/lightning discharge during storms and decaying and condensing surroundings creating protons and creating WATER (think troposphere and low pressure weather disturbances).O2 + quantum vacuum ionization energy --->2O-- + 4H+ = 2H2O. If you ionize oxygen you get nitrogen, which between the two make up most of the atmosphere. 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter Agreed 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from the Dirac sea Agreed. I think the residual radiation changes because the Dirac Sea varies in vacuum concentration - it is stringy and brany. I think the Sun is vomiting this stuff at us and "leaking branes", i.e. the Earth is "pulling a vacuum" on the Sun. Our oceans/water are really a result of our decayed/condensed quantum gravity field. I am still thinking the electromagnetic pulsed field from a magnetron or klystron is possibly causing the Dirac sea to "leak" protons or something...Maybe nature pulls positive charge from the vacuum to offset the electromagnetic field from a Doppler to keep a balance? I think it relates to the Doppler Shift. Dopplers signals get warped and bent and are subject to anomolous clear air reflections all of the time. On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case for > this premise: > > > > 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an > illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects > > 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter > > 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from the > Dirac sea > > > > Now comes the interesting part. Can this information, if valid, be put to > use in alternative energy? > > > > One seemingly obvious way to proceed is to consider CMB as a “leak” of > some kind. If it is a leak, then we want to increase the flow rate. > > > > There are many ways to increase the flow rate of various streams, some of > which are applicable to microwave photons … so let the games begin… > > > > *From:* ChemE Stewart > > > > http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html > > *From:* David Roberson > > A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the > CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe and > is supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large massive > objects. I have long wondered how this congregation of material could > occur in matter that has no way to release the gravitational energy by > radiation as with normal matter. Perhaps the CMB is generated gradually by > the condensation of the dark matter. > > Or … perhaps dark matter is another aspect of the Dirac Sea ? > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0705/0705.2908.pdf > > > > > > > >
