An invisible, ancient source of energy surrounds us—energy that powered the first explorations of the world, and that may be a key to the future...
http://hint.fm/wind/ It is our quantum vacuum/dirac sea powering that wind... On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil-- > > The article cited below has the following explanation of the Casmir effect > in a static situation of two mirrors: > > >>>"This attractive force is caused by the radiation pressure exerted by > virtual photons outside the mirrors and the fact that this pressure exceeds > the pressure between the mirrors because of the limited number of modes of > electromagnetic vibration that are permitted within this gap. In other > words, the force results from a mismatch of electromagnetic modes in space. > "<<< > > Sounds like a new EMMMF (electro-magnetic modes mismatch force) force > for consideration in LENR energy coupling and overcoming electro static > barriers between items making up a conduction surface between two nano > particles of the external surfaces of a hollow nano cylinder. Such a > force may be all that is required to force a H close enough to a Ni > surfaces being squeezed by EMMMF to react. > > The quoted statement does not explain the force as far as I can > tell. However, It refers to radiation pressure which is caused by a > transfer of linear momentum between the virtual photon and the real matter > electrons of the real mirror. This suggests that a virtual photon and a > real photon have the same effect on matter. It seems to imply that the > flux of virtual photons with its integrated momentum hitting the mirror > from the inside is less than the flux and momentum of the virtual photons > hitting the mirror from the outside because fewer occupy the vacuum between > the mirrors as a result of the limited number of modes allowed per a unit > of 2-D space. Also in the 2-D space it may be that their direction of > propagation is limited along in a plane such that a transfer of momentum > normal to the plane does not exist. > > I wonder what determines the energy/momentum of the virtual photons in the > vacuum inside and outside the mirrors' surfaces. If there is a spectrum > of energy of the virtual photons, what determines that? It seems a measure > of the static Casmir force would allow a calculation of the of the density > of virtual photons in the vacuum at virtual temperatures along with the > changing constraint on the modes of E/M vibration density as the space > approaches a 2-D condition. This may allow determining what that virtual > temperature is and hence the expected spectrum of the virtual photons in > the vacuum. > > If the ambient virtual temperature of the vacuum explains the > comsic background microwave spectrum, wouldn't that be note worthy for the > astrophysics guys? > > Finally, I had a problem visualizing the thinness of the mirrors in a > real experiment. Also that they apparently reflect from both sides > equally. > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2014 1:08 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea? > > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/nov/17/how-to-turn-darkness-into-light > > Photons are formed from the vacuum as a part of the virtual particle > formation process. But do photons give up vacuum energy if they > annihilate with their antiparticle? Does the photon have an > antiparticle(antiphoton) that can give back energy to the vacuum? > > If there is no anti-photon, won't the virtual photon made real over time > add somehow to the CBR? > > Can someone explain how the Casmir virtual photon process works to keep > the vacuum energy balanced at zero? > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case >> for this premise: >> >> >> >> 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an >> illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects >> >> 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter >> >> 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from >> the Dirac sea >> >> >> >> Now comes the interesting part. Can this information, if valid, be put to >> use in alternative energy? >> >> >> >> One seemingly obvious way to proceed is to consider CMB as a “leak” of >> some kind. If it is a leak, then we want to increase the flow rate. >> >> >> >> There are many ways to increase the flow rate of various streams, some of >> which are applicable to microwave photons … so let the games begin… >> >> >> >> *From:* ChemE Stewart >> >> >> >> http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html >> >> *From:* David Roberson >> >> A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for >> the CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe >> and is supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large >> massive objects. I have long wondered how this congregation of material >> could occur in matter that has no way to release the gravitational energy >> by radiation as with normal matter. Perhaps the CMB is generated gradually >> by the condensation of the dark matter. >> >> Or … perhaps dark matter is another aspect of the Dirac Sea ? >> >> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0705/0705.2908.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
