Another way to get time dilation is through density. Packing lots of matter into a confined space will serve just as well as applying extreme speed. Slowing down a particle through extreme confinement will force that particle into getting where it wants to go through tunneling. When that particle is tunneling, what is its state in space/time? Is it still in this universe?
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Roarty, Francis X < francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > Is it too naïve of me to suggest that we can derive some insight from > extreme relativistic considerations where for example the paradox twin > attains 99% of C? the twins are existing in two different inertial frames > 90 degrees displaced from each other yet both still perceive themselves in > normal 3space.. the temporal dilations and contractions we perceive between > inertial frames in extreme must be indicative of the interface between our > “perceived” 3 spaces and this other dimensional sea of Dirac using any > vocabulary you like for the inhabitants, epos, virtual particles, ether or > even river of time. The Pythagorean relationship between V^2 and C^2 in SR > also suggests much ambiguity and relative measure when using terms like > zero K because the local observer is unaware of changes in time or > temperature and if temperature is based on motion [dx/dt] then at C all > spatial displacement ceases and only temporal displacement remains from the > perspective of the stationary observer. I guess my point is that if the > twin frames are 90 degrees displaced from each other then 1 of the twins > must be traveling parallel to the direction of this Dirac sea instead of > perpendicular. IMHO Lorentzian ether, the appearance and annihilation of > virtual particles and even epos are all valid perspectives for what the > ancients called the river of time and SR serves to formulate the rate of > intersection between these dimensions. > Fran > > _____________________________________________ > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net <jone...@pacbell.net>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:40 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:positronium BEC from molecular Ps2 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton > > > If the Dirac sea exists in another physical dimension at near zero K, as > assumed, and is also a BEC in itself, according to Don Hotson, then it > might be possible to collect liquid Ps2 directly for use as... hmmm... > rocket fuel? > > Come on Jonesie, it's more complicated than being at or near AbZ. Negative > energy means that there are negative temperatures and reactions which > generate heat in our world create negative energy in the bizarro world. It > would be a world of symmetry with high energy negative temperature > reactions. Stars would have coronas of -10,000 degrees. > > or not. > > Terry, > > Sounds like you are envisioning Dirac's sea as "like 3-space" in an > inverted or reciprocal way. Perhaps as a strange kind of parallel universe? > > Maybe. I envision it as much simpler and "boring" so to speak - a > near-infinite array of strings or tubes, with every point in our 3-space > having a corresponding string of Dirac space. The string appears to be > nearly 1D from our perspective, having length from its own perspective but > no other tube is “there” than the one of the observer, so it can be called > a fractal of one-space. > > This is different from Hotson and some other conceptions – and there are > different hypertubes, sometimes called a Dirac tube or the Bhabha tube. At > this point in time, there are more questions than answers. > > >
