*
Andrea Rossi
June 29th, 2014 at 9:46 AM
Giuliano Bettini: I edited your text for obvious reasons, conserving the
meaning of it. You must know that the peer reviewing of a scientific
publication usually takes 6 months as an average. The experiment made by the
Third Independent Party is important, as you correctly wrote, and the
Professors, to avoid criticisms, need all the time necessary to publish results
of which they need to be sure beyond any reasonable doubt, also considering all
the experience and the critics made during and after the 2013 experiment. It is
not just matter of patience, it is also matter of respect for serious
scientific work. The reviewing must take all the time it needs on the base of a
serious and exhaustive analysis of the results, positive or negative as they
might be. Warm Regards, A.R.
*
Andrea Rossi
June 29th, 2014 at 7:40 AM
Angel Blume: We will give detailed public information about the 1 MW plant in
operation in the factory of the Customer when the visits will start. At the
moment we cannot give any specific information. It is matter of months, not
years, though. Warm Regards, A.R.
