Kevin, At least you have to try to believe that people are not all malicious. He certainly could say that he is disappointed and that he feels that they have broken their promises. He could say a lot other things instead of just throwing out a lie, which he for sure would have to pay dearly for if you are right (which you are not). There for sure are other motivational factors for people than greed.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I read it. What else can Rossi say? You don't spit at the > alligator until you're done crossing the river. > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Alan, >> I am 100% a believer in that those statements are a true reflection of >> the reasons for the delay. >> I hope Kevin reads it. >> >> Best Regards , >> Lennart Thornros >> >> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >> [email protected] >> +1 916 436 1899 >> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 >> >> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> - Andrea Rossi >>> June 29th, 2014 at 9:46 AM >>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=8#comment-972594> >>> >>> Giuliano Bettini: >>> I edited your text for obvious reasons, conserving the meaning of >>> it. You must know that the peer reviewing of a scientific publication >>> usually takes 6 months as an average. >>> The experiment made by the Third Independent Party is important, as >>> you correctly wrote, and the Professors, to avoid criticisms, need all >>> the >>> time necessary to publish results of which they need to be sure beyond >>> any >>> reasonable doubt, also considering all the experience and the critics >>> made >>> during and after the 2013 experiment. It is not just matter of patience, >>> it >>> is also matter of respect for serious scientific work. The reviewing must >>> take all the time it needs on the base of a serious and exhaustive >>> analysis >>> of the results, positive or negative as they might be. >>> Warm Regards, >>> A.R. >>> >>> >>> - Andrea Rossi >>> June 29th, 2014 at 7:40 AM >>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=8#comment-972560> >>> >>> Angel Blume: >>> We will give detailed public information about the 1 MW plant in >>> operation in the factory of the Customer when the visits will start. At >>> the >>> moment we cannot give any specific information. It is matter of months, >>> not >>> years, though. >>> Warm Regards, >>> A.R. >>> >>> >> >
