Yeah, I read it.  What else can Rossi say?  You don't spit at the alligator
until you're done crossing the river.


On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> I am 100% a believer in that those statements are a true reflection of the
> reasons for the delay.
> I hope Kevin reads it.
>
> Best Regards ,
> Lennart Thornros
>
> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
> [email protected]
> +1 916 436 1899
> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
>
> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a
> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>    - Andrea Rossi
>>    June 29th, 2014 at 9:46 AM
>>    <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=8#comment-972594>
>>
>>    Giuliano Bettini:
>>    I edited your text for obvious reasons, conserving the meaning of it.
>>    You must know that the peer reviewing of a scientific publication usually
>>    takes 6 months as an average.
>>    The experiment made by the Third Independent Party is important, as
>>    you correctly wrote, and the Professors, to avoid criticisms, need all the
>>    time necessary to publish results of which they need to be sure beyond any
>>    reasonable doubt, also considering all the experience and the critics made
>>    during and after the 2013 experiment. It is not just matter of patience, 
>> it
>>    is also matter of respect for serious scientific work. The reviewing must
>>    take all the time it needs on the base of a serious and exhaustive 
>> analysis
>>    of the results, positive or negative as they might be.
>>    Warm Regards,
>>    A.R.
>>
>>
>>    - Andrea Rossi
>>    June 29th, 2014 at 7:40 AM
>>    <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=8#comment-972560>
>>
>>    Angel Blume:
>>    We will give detailed public information about the 1 MW plant in
>>    operation in the factory of the Customer when the visits will start. At 
>> the
>>    moment we cannot give any specific information. It is matter of months, 
>> not
>>    years, though.
>>    Warm Regards,
>>    A.R.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to