>From Axil:
... > This lack of control has never been solved and is one reason why Rossi's > reactor has not been certified and released as a safe product that does > not explode. I agree. Regardless of what theory might best explain the excess heat being generated from Rossi's device, I know I have come to a similar conclusion in the sense that, IMHO, he has yet to engineer a practical way of controlling the reaction. Without a practical way of controlling the reaction, without a reliable On and Off switch, the device has no hope of being commercialized. What saddens me is not the personal opinion that Rossi has yet to find a reliable way to control the device. I'm frustrated by the apparent fact that the lack of controllability appears to be used as an excuse, as justification exploited by skeptics and debunkers to continue to ignore the more extraordinary fact that excess heat that cannot be accounted for by any known chemical means is nevertheless happening. Kind of a shell game going on here. I still believe there is very good chance that eventually the equivalent of an On and Off switch will be worked out. It strikes me mostly as just another engineering challenge that needs to be tackled with a sufficient amount of financial backing. So... In time. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks
