At 20,000C, aluminum will vaporize and when this aluminum plasma cools,
this LENR active  aluminum dust will form.
***I don't think you commented on my proposal that such cooling could form
a "relative" BEC or Fermiion Condensate.  Even though the absolute
temperature is well above what one might expect for a BEC (even a 1
dimensional Luttinger Liquid BEC), the fact that it is rapidly cooling
might create a relative localized 1D BEC.  What do you think?


On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> There are two types of nano-antennas that can produce the magnetic force
> that LENR drives off of, the nickel nanowire is the first type and
> the second is mainly hydrogen nanoparticles that condense out of the
> cooling plasma and possibly some aluminum from Rossi's vaporizing primary
> heater. This second type of nanoparticle don't really start producing
> magnetism well until the temperature gets very high.
>
> For example, when a spark vaporizes a piece of aluminum, this type of
> nano-particle is produced by the heat of the spark. At 20,000C, aluminum
> will vaporize and when this aluminum plasma cools, this LENR active
>  aluminum dust will form.
>
> Reactor meltdown is a two step process, the first stage is fueled by the
> nickel and then the last stage just like in a spark discharge, the meltdown
>  is fueled by the other types of nanoparticles that condense out of the
> plasma from the structure of the reactor that the too hot nickel has
> produced.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Axil:
>>
>> Why doesn't it shut down when the metal matrix melts?  Is it because the
>> reaction moves more to the interior of the metal matrix where it is still
>> solid?  The key to stopping such an activity would be to add a nitrogen
>> epitaxial layer.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating temperature were
>>> the nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat is produced. That
>>> range is between about 400C to 1100C. This is the subcritical temperature
>>> range where energy must be input to "pump" the reaction. In order to
>>> produce the highest COP, Rossi must run his reactor close to the maximum
>>> subcritical temperature: say 1000 C.  If for some reason, the reactor
>>> temperature exceeds 1100C, the nickel nanostructures will meal and the
>>> power output of the dynamic NAE becomes a factor. This is when the reactor
>>> begins to melt down. Rossi has not discovered a way to stop  power
>>> production of the dynamic NAE before the reactor goes supercritical(COP
>>> goes to infinity).
>>>
>>> This lack of control has never been solved and is one reason why Rossi's
>>> reactor has not been certified and released as a safe product that does not
>>> explode.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I've been out of this thread on religion and radiometric dating, but
>>>> a certain fellow can't take no for an answer.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding Axil's speculation, he still needs to explain how his
>>>> nanostructure can perform what he speculates it can perform at high temps.
>>>> I know I keep harping on this sintering, melting of nanostructures stuff,
>>>> but it is a very strong objection to his theory.  He needs to be able to
>>>> account for this physical property of nanonickel, instead of just brushing
>>>> it aside as something I am too dumb to understand.  Unless he can come up
>>>> with a reasonable explanation why his nickel nanostructures won't sinter
>>>> and melt, his theory really is dead, no matter how elegant and esoteric the
>>>> rest of the theory is.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jojo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> *From:* Steve High <[email protected]>
>>>> *To:* Vortex <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
>>>>
>>>> Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
>>>> could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
>>>> posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting
>>>> ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the learned
>>>> folk at vortex, but that seems to be getting crowded out by the discussion
>>>> on radiometrics and religion. I would like to read that too, just on a
>>>> different thread. The crux of Axil's idea seems to be that nanomagnetic
>>>> excitation of the nucleus results in the production of virtual mesons that
>>>> turn into muons that go on to promote  proton-proton interactions. I am
>>>> wondering if these individual steps have received scientific exposition or
>>>> validation elsewhere, and can all this take place without having to deal
>>>> with the dreaded gamma ray?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   We are talking rational history here, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Google hits for
>>>>> "historicity of Bhagavad Gita"  :  3
>>>>>
>>>>> "historicity of Jesus"  :  about 214,000
>>>>>
>>>>> Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad
>>>>> Gita, "do you really believe these are historical accounts"?  Their answer
>>>>> is basically no, it's just something they believe in.  They were raised
>>>>> believing it, so they don't rock that boat.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in
>>>>>> his previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed.
>>>>>> Or do you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I am turning the other cheek by not reciprocating with an insult.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As for your other point, I am not sure what you want to prove to
>>>>>>> me.  Are these passages from the Mahabharata?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jojo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to