For example, DGT uses a spark to produce nanoparticle based nano-antennas, A BEC will form after the temperature of the plasma produced by the spark get to a temperature where the nanoparticles condense out of the plasma. All kinds of elements will form this nanoparticles. At that time, the SPPs will begin to form on those nanoparticles and then the magnetic solitons will join the global magnetic based BEC.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > At 20,000C, aluminum will vaporize and when this aluminum plasma cools, > this LENR active aluminum dust will form. > ***I don't think you commented on my proposal that such cooling could form > a "relative" BEC or Fermiion Condensate. Even though the absolute > temperature is well above what one might expect for a BEC (even a 1 > dimensional Luttinger Liquid BEC), the fact that it is rapidly cooling > might create a relative localized 1D BEC. What do you think? > > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are two types of nano-antennas that can produce the magnetic force >> that LENR drives off of, the nickel nanowire is the first type and >> the second is mainly hydrogen nanoparticles that condense out of the >> cooling plasma and possibly some aluminum from Rossi's vaporizing primary >> heater. This second type of nanoparticle don't really start producing >> magnetism well until the temperature gets very high. >> >> For example, when a spark vaporizes a piece of aluminum, this type of >> nano-particle is produced by the heat of the spark. At 20,000C, aluminum >> will vaporize and when this aluminum plasma cools, this LENR active >> aluminum dust will form. >> >> Reactor meltdown is a two step process, the first stage is fueled by the >> nickel and then the last stage just like in a spark discharge, the meltdown >> is fueled by the other types of nanoparticles that condense out of the >> plasma from the structure of the reactor that the too hot nickel has >> produced. >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Axil: >>> >>> Why doesn't it shut down when the metal matrix melts? Is it because the >>> reaction moves more to the interior of the metal matrix where it is still >>> solid? The key to stopping such an activity would be to add a nitrogen >>> epitaxial layer. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating >>>> temperature were the nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat >>>> is produced. That range is between about 400C to 1100C. This is the >>>> subcritical temperature range where energy must be input to "pump" the >>>> reaction. In order to produce the highest COP, Rossi must run his reactor >>>> close to the maximum subcritical temperature: say 1000 C. If for some >>>> reason, the reactor temperature exceeds 1100C, the nickel nanostructures >>>> will meal and the power output of the dynamic NAE becomes a factor. This is >>>> when the reactor begins to melt down. Rossi has not discovered a way >>>> to stop power production of the dynamic NAE before the reactor goes >>>> supercritical(COP goes to infinity). >>>> >>>> This lack of control has never been solved and is one reason why >>>> Rossi's reactor has not been certified and released as a safe product that >>>> does not explode. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've been out of this thread on religion and radiometric dating, but >>>>> a certain fellow can't take no for an answer. >>>>> >>>>> Regarding Axil's speculation, he still needs to explain how his >>>>> nanostructure can perform what he speculates it can perform at high temps. >>>>> I know I keep harping on this sintering, melting of nanostructures stuff, >>>>> but it is a very strong objection to his theory. He needs to be able to >>>>> account for this physical property of nanonickel, instead of just brushing >>>>> it aside as something I am too dumb to understand. Unless he can come up >>>>> with a reasonable explanation why his nickel nanostructures won't sinter >>>>> and melt, his theory really is dead, no matter how elegant and esoteric >>>>> the >>>>> rest of the theory is. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jojo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> *From:* Steve High <[email protected]> >>>>> *To:* Vortex <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL >>>>> >>>>> Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating >>>>> could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout >>>>> posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting >>>>> ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the >>>>> learned >>>>> folk at vortex, but that seems to be getting crowded out by the discussion >>>>> on radiometrics and religion. I would like to read that too, just on a >>>>> different thread. The crux of Axil's idea seems to be that nanomagnetic >>>>> excitation of the nucleus results in the production of virtual mesons that >>>>> turn into muons that go on to promote proton-proton interactions. I am >>>>> wondering if these individual steps have received scientific exposition or >>>>> validation elsewhere, and can all this take place without having to deal >>>>> with the dreaded gamma ray? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We are talking rational history here, right? >>>>>> >>>>>> Google hits for >>>>>> "historicity of Bhagavad Gita" : 3 >>>>>> >>>>>> "historicity of Jesus" : about 214,000 >>>>>> >>>>>> Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad >>>>>> Gita, "do you really believe these are historical accounts"? Their >>>>>> answer >>>>>> is basically no, it's just something they believe in. They were raised >>>>>> believing it, so they don't rock that boat. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, >>>>>>> in his previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. >>>>>>> Or do you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am turning the other cheek by not reciprocating with an insult. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for your other point, I am not sure what you want to prove to >>>>>>>> me. Are these passages from the Mahabharata? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jojo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
