It now becomes apparent why we suffered through such a long delay in seeing this paper published. I would love to the original version.
Obviously, they went through several months trying to edit out all of the
“problem” areas. Apparently they missed a few – one of which was the
admission that Rossi himself stopped the dummy calibration run.
Since that detail looms as very important, I shudder to think what would
happen if they had succeeded in editing it out, in time so it was not
discovered. They might have actually been able to force this through as real
science – and not more of Rossi’s charade.
_____________________________________________
Of course, Rothwell may be trying to distinguish between
Rossi actually doing it himself of giving the order to do it.
Hmm… flashback a few years …. "It depends on what the
meaning of the word 'is' is.” I would hope that we are above that kind of
double-talk on vortex, but of course we are not.
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene
You seem to be saying that it is not found
in the “revised” or edited version? There is an edited version of the
report, in which details like this are removed. Rothwell, no doubt, would
chose to only read the edited version.
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Care to share where you saw this?
The dummy reactor was switched on at 12:20
PM of 24 February 2014 by Andrea Rossi who gradually brought it to the power
level requested by us. Rossi later intervened to switch off the dummy, and
in the following subsequent operations on the E-Cat: charge insertion,
reactor startup, reactor shutdown and powder charge extraction. Throughout
the test, no further intervention or interference on his part occurred;
moreover, all phases of the test were monitored directly by the
collaboration
They did not calibrate above 450 C and this
was not done ON ORDERS FROM ROSSI
JR: It does not say that anywhere.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
