Jones: In fairness to this process it also says of the dummy reactor test that “Rossi gradually brought it to the power level THEY requested” (emphasis added). It doesn’t say that the test power level was determined or demanded by Rossi. The fact he turned it off after they had what they wanted is not the same as saying they didn’t test at a higher level “ON ORDERS FROM ROSSI”.
I am not saying the test was adequate or inadequate, I am not qualified. But some of what is happening here is not objective and may be driven by other motives, i.e the same as the nonsense you usually see from Krivit. Ransom _____________________________________________ From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 10:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Determining the transmittance . . . of semitransparent materials at elevated temperatures You seem to be saying that it is not found in the “revised” or edited version? There is an edited version of the report, in which details like this are removed. Rothwell, no doubt, would chose to only read the edited version. From: Blaze Spinnaker Care to share where you saw this? The dummy reactor was switched on at 12:20 PM of 24 February 2014 by Andrea Rossi who gradually brought it to the power level requested by us. Rossi later intervened to switch off the dummy, and in the following subsequent operations on the E-Cat: charge insertion, reactor startup, reactor shutdown and powder charge extraction. Throughout the test, no further intervention or interference on his part occurred; moreover, all phases of the test were monitored directly by the collaboration They did not calibrate above 450 C and this was not done ON ORDERS FROM ROSSI JR: It does not say that anywhere.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
