Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> There is no potential financial motive here as far as I know. > > > > That is the major problem here, stated simply: you do not know. > Do you know? Do you want to tell us? Because if you do not know or you are not at liberty to discuss this, I suggest you shut up. You should not make unfounded allegations about unethical and possibly criminal acts. That's libel. If you want to quote other people, the way I quoted Gamberale on Defkalion, that is not libel. It is reporting. Based on what is been published in the mass media, I cannot see any reason why Rossi would want to confuse the issue by changing the ashes. There is no way that could help his patent application or any other aspect of his work as far as I can see. In any case let me reiterate that I have only discussed the calorimetry, not the mass spectroscopy, so it is not possible that you were disputing with me any technical aspects of the mass spectroscopy. The previous message I quoted from you was definitely an accusation of fraud in the calorimetry: "No one would ever use an IR camera in this situation unless they have the intent to deceive." It is ridiculous for you to deny that is what you meant. By the way, as far as I know Rossi had no say in design of this experiment. The decision to "use an IR camera in the situation" was made by Levi et al. Perhaps you thought they had the intent to deceive. - Jed
