HI Alex,

We're not meaning to step on any toes, far from it :)

Just postulating possibilities.

James

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey all,
> It's great to see your support for the protocol. We don't want to leave you
> hanging but please give us a little time to sort ourselves out.
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> On 6 August 2010 17:06, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm happy to present both options to Google, and remember, that's who
>> we need to bring on board with regards to the rest of the code and
>> information.
>>
>> James
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dave butlerdi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Apache would insure a greater number of contributors and Wave is already
>> > incorporated in several
>> > projects such as Shindig. Apache projects have the advantage of good
>> > exposure and due to the
>> > organisational infrastructure it instills a greater degree of
>> > confidence.
>> >
>> > Hadoop was the last project I have worked with to move to Apache, but
>> > CouchDB and others have
>> > also done well. Others such as River(Jini) have not fared well but that
>> > community was stagnent long
>> > before.
>> >
>> > In order to increase adoption and to get fresh ideas into this project I
>> > would think that Apache is best.
>> >
>> > Just my .02€
>> >
>> > On 6 August 2010 08:47, dougx <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Creating a foundation ala wiki foundation, mozilla foundation, apache
>> >> foundation involves considerably more than simply creating a new
>> >> source archive on github; servers, website, incorporation, graphic
>> >> design, etc. Even if you crowd source much of the work, there are
>> >> costs involved at various levels in setting something like that up.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps folding it in as an apache incubator project (as suggested) is
>> >> a better idea.
>> >>
>> >> Personally I think something along the lines of the google summer of
>> >> code would be neat; small (but not insignificant) funding to
>> >> students / research groups to participate and develop / add to the
>> >> project. Perhaps even directly pass any raised capital to the soc
>> >> group, with the caveat that those funds are ear marked for wave-
>> >> related projects for next years summer of code.
>> >>
>> >> ~
>> >> D.
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 6, 12:31 pm, Brett Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > I'm curious what you'd be seeing as the primary responsibilities of
>> >> > said
>> >> > fund?
>> >> >
>> >> > What problems would you want to tackle that Google hasn't on it's
>> >> > 10M+ a
>> >> > year budget?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM, dougx <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > Perhaps someone (in the US) could start a kickstarter fund for
>> >> > > setting
>> >> > > up a wave foundation?
>> >> >
>> >> > > Probably best to wait until we get official word from the google
>> >> > > guys
>> >> > > on what's happening, but I'd support a wave foundation to keep this
>> >> > > stuff going.
>> >> >
>> >> > > ~
>> >> > > Doug.
>> >> >
>> >> > > On Aug 5, 11:20 pm, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > > Would it be a good idea to have some sort of forum or area for
>> >> > > > all
>> >> > > > people/groups currently working on their own WFP servers?
>> >> > > > Kinda help foster collaboration between them? or to help form a
>> >> > > > the
>> >> > > > begins of a foundation?
>> >> > > > Might be an idea to try to contact all the various groups
>> >> > > > (pygowave,
>> >> > > > ruby on sails, Process One..) and get some discussions going.
>> >> >
>> >> > > > On Aug 5, 3:23 pm, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > > > I agree with much said.
>> >> > > > > From my own viewpoint though, it would help if it was a lot
>> >> > > > > easier
>> >> > > > > to
>> >> > > > > set up Wave servers and federate them.
>> >> > > > > Part of the USP is its distributed nature, yet there really
>> >> > > > > isn't
>> >> > > > > much
>> >> > > > > federation going on at all at the moment.
>> >> >
>> >> > > > > Too many people (imho) saw Wave just as a website. A front end
>> >> > > > > by
>> >> > > > > google for a "thing" and nothing more.
>> >> > > > > As soon as theres a few clients (online and standalone),
>> >> > > > > servers
>> >> > > > > and
>> >> > > > > GUIs about all communicating on the standard I think the whole
>> >> > > > > concept and power of the WFP would come across much better.
>> >> >
>> >> > > > > On Aug 5, 5:24 am, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > > > > What I would love to see is something like the Apache
>> >> > > > > > foundation
>> >> > > setup
>> >> > > > > > for Wave. Google to open up as much code as they can and dump
>> >> > > > > > it
>> >> > > > > > to
>> >> > > > > > the foundation along with responsibility for the various
>> >> > > > > > specs
>> >> > > > > > and
>> >> > > > > > protocols.
>> >> >
>> >> > > > > > Has anyone heard from Novell or SAP about their own Wave
>> >> > > > > > offerings?
>> >> > > > > > Getting them involved can only help keep the tech and ideas
>> >> > > > > > behind
>> >> > > > > > wave going.
>> >> >
>> >> > > > > > James
>> >> >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> > > Groups
>> >> > > "Wave Protocol" group.
>> >> > > To post to this group, send email to
>> >> > > [email protected].
>> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog
>> >> > > legroups.com>
>> >> > > .
>> >> > > For more options, visit this group at
>> >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Brett Morganhttp://www.google.com/profiles/brett.morgan
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups
>> >> "Wave Protocol" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected].
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Dave Butler
>> > butlerdi-at-pharm2phork-dot-org
>> >
>> > Also on Skype as pharm2phork
>> >
>> > Get Skype here http://www.skype.com/download.html
>> >
>> >
>> > **********************************************************************
>> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>> > the system manager.
>> >
>> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
>> > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>> >
>> > www.mimesweeper.com
>> > **********************************************************************
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "Wave Protocol" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Wave Protocol" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to