Without OT - is that meant to be a reference to Oster and Imine's
work?  Or am I giving you too much credit?

Cheers,

Dan


On Aug 7, 8:58 pm, Patrick Nagel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Brett,
>
> On 2010-08-07 07:13 UTC Brett Morgan wrote:
>
> > OT and version control systems serve very different masters. By that I mean
> > you wouldn't want to use the merge system of version control systems for
> > Wave, just as you would not want to use OT for managing source code
> > history.
>
> > The reason is simple, to steal a line from one of the Wave team, OT is too
> > good. OT's merge never fails.
>
> > In version control systems you, as a user, rely on the merge failing to
> > highlight areas that need human intervention. In wave we don't want humans
> > to have to constantly be involved in handling the real time merge of the
> > disparate change streams.
>
> I'm aware of that. I was answering Ian's statements "My concern is that WFP is
> tightly coupled with OT, and OT is complex.", which seems to imply that
> something without OT could be more successful, at least as a first step.
> And then later he writes "I wonder whether a slightly different protocol [...]
> would be received better by the community. [...] one that would allow services
> to federate any type of content.", which seems to also be covered by VCS, as
> far as I can tell.
>
> I didn't really think this whole thing through, and maybe the required manual
> merging vs. OT in WFP makes it not workable for a communication/collaboration
> platform - but then so would any other implementation without OT, no?
>
> Patrick.
>
> --
> Key ID: 0x86E346D4            http://patrick-nagel.net/key.asc
> Fingerprint: 7745 E1BE FA8B FBAD 76AB 2BFC C981 E686 86E3 46D4
>
>  signature.asc
> < 1KViewDownload

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to