Hi Ian, On 2010-08-06 03:11 UTC Ian Roughley wrote: [...] > One thing that no one has addressed on this list is that by continuing WFP > you also need to continue OT and the JS editor. If you don't have a > strong fully-featured non-buggy editor that people/companies can use > without developing themselves, OT won't be continued or used. Without OT, > the WFP protocol breaks down. It's all a mini-ecosystem. > > I wonder whether a slightly different protocol that would allow for the > federation of existing non-real-time content as well as real-time content > would be received better by the community. One that avoided the need for > significant code changes, and one that would allow services to federate > any type of content.
I think that does actually exist already, in many different implementations: all modern VCS (git, mercurial, ...). Patrick. -- Key ID: 0x86E346D4 http://patrick-nagel.net/key.asc Fingerprint: 7745 E1BE FA8B FBAD 76AB 2BFC C981 E686 86E3 46D4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
