Hi, I wrote a walk-through and some explanations about my ideas for using a REST-like protocol and to allow non-OT clients to participate in the game:
https://wave.google.com/wave/waveref/googlewave.com/w+x9ezNAnGC Cheers Torben 2010/8/7 Dave butlerdi <[email protected]> > Agreed. > > However if you have seen the news from Novell regarding their take on the > product the main bit from Google is OT. > A rest interface and all is nice.The ability for Gadgets and agents is > good. But much of this type of functionality is available > in other forms, or could be easily done without this particular product. > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/06/novell_google_wave_pulse/ > > The details can be worked out later, but to leave as is and then do sub > projects like protocolC, etc as well > as sub projects for the gadget and agent bits would be cool. > > I just question weather it would be percieved as being worth the bother > without OT (It is the secret sauce). > Also to dramatically change the code base would possibly devalue the work > by those who have been forging ahead with this codebase. > > > Once again just my .02€ ... > > Regards > > Dave Butler > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- --------------------------- Prof. Torben Weis Universitaet Duisburg-Essen [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
