Hi Daniel, On 2010-08-07 14:01 UTC Daniel Paull wrote: > Without OT - is that meant to be a reference to Oster and Imine's > work? Or am I giving you too much credit?
I have never heard of their work, so yes, you're most certainly giving me too much credit ;) Again: Ian Roughley proposed (maybe) moving away from OT - at least that's how I understood his mail - and I was then just thinking aloud whether that wouldn't be similar to current VCS protocols. Patrick. -- Key ID: 0x86E346D4 http://patrick-nagel.net/key.asc Fingerprint: 7745 E1BE FA8B FBAD 76AB 2BFC C981 E686 86E3 46D4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
