Rich Kulawiec said:
>
> But a web server with Linux+Apache beats one with NT+IIS
> by every criteria that I can think of: throughput, reliability, security,
> support, etc., so the fact that it's free is just a nice bonus.
Actually, I have seen several different sources indicating that IIS
throughput is better than Apache. Can anyone confirm/deny?
However, after wrestling with IIS4 & FP Extension configurationss
for the past week, I would concede that Apache could max out at 1 op
per hour and I'd still prefer it to that poorly designed piece of
garbage. (Where poorly designed is defined as anything that keeps me
guessing despite having full online docs, the "IIS Resource Kit",
and the "Site Server Bible" on hand.)
--bill
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
