On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:56 AM, dlypka <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I wish the wiki used the WYSIWYG HTML control for content entry a la
> T3 instead of the text mode with python doc tags.
> And then I think an XSL transform should be used to strip out the tags
> to store a parallel copy of the content that is a pure text 'blob'
> and then that text blob need to be run through some sort of full text
> search preparation process which would identify keywords and insert
> them into an index.
> Each page would have one parallel text blob. The full text search
> could search the blobs using the index, and return the corresponding
> page links where matching text was found.


Thanks for your comments.

At this point, I think there are 2 tracks to this discussion we could have:


   - immediate need:  what do we need to do to wiki to further community
   manual creation (we have already decided docutils reStructuredText format,
   and sphinx document generation - so lets keep the discussion within these
   parameters for this part;
   - Long term: how do we make a "best in class" wiki appliance for web2py
   (which could include the above, but much more)


>
>
> On May 3, 3:50 am, Joe  Barnhart <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yarko --
> >
> > I can't say about others, but for me the key missing features in the
> > wiki are:
> >
> > * Wiki-style links and organization
> > * Easy navigable URLs
> > * More compact and usable layout
> >
> > All wikis I have used in the past use embedded WikiStyleTags to create
> > links to other pages on the wiki, or even create stub pages
> > automatically.  Ours does not.  It's linking is very cumbersome and
> > more like a traditional web page.
> >
> > URLs in most wikis are related to the linked pages, so the page above
> > might have a link ofhttp://www.ourwiki.com/wikistyletags.  It makes
> > the page easily reachable and much more accessible than an
> > automatically generated crypto-garf name.
> >
> > The layout of the current wiki is very large and diffuse.  It feature
> > enormous titles, big fonts, and just does not use space efficiently.
> > I know it's a style thing, but style is important too.  This is less
> > important than the wiki features already mentioned, but it ranks
> > somewhere.
> >
> > I don't want anyone to feel like I'm telling them what to do.  I am
> > just a messenger, bearing the bad news that we still do not have
> > significant community involvement in solving our documentation
> > dilemma.  While I am becoming more proficient at reading Python ;-), I
> > believe we need more accessible documentation if we are ever to take
> > on Django or PHP.
> >
> > On May 2, 2:44 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > talk is cheap...
> >
> > > ...there is no shortage of opinions or advice on what "others should
> do", or
> > > (worse) what "others should stop doing"  (as I read this all)...- Hide
> quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to