I think it would be "politically" bad for me to host a non-web2py- based wiki. If anybody wants to create an alternate wiki and host it. As soon as it is decent I do not mind linking it.
Massimo On May 2, 4:44 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: > talk is cheap... > > ...there is no shortage of opinions or advice on what "others should do", or > (worse) what "others should stop doing" (as I read this all)... > > Who will tell what is missing to make the showcase? > > Who will make a functional comparison with (pick your favorite python wiki - > but keep to one using RST please, as we have a commitment to do the > community manual in sphinx)? > > Who will then write the specs of what is missing (or just write examples)? > > Since the wiki just quickly came together, and it's not being used for > _some_ reason, who wants to start listing what those reasons are, and > identifying the key blocks? > > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:59 PM, waTR <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All you have to do is put together a wiki like web book. The wiki > > web2py currently set-up is close, just needs some small modifications. > > Once you have the wiki set-up for a book style knowledge repository, > > you can create a table of contents (PAGES list), and slowly fill-in > > those pages over time. It is not something that would happen over > > night, but something needs to be set-up to start this. > > > Massimo, could you modify/add something like this to the wiki? > > Basically, it involves modifying the PAGES list view to include > > Headings, sub-headings, and titles. I would be happy to work on the > > table-of-contents to start... > > > We definitely need an electronic community generated book in addition > > to the official manual. Not to replace mind you, but to elaborate on > > the topics covered in the manual and provide extended examples and > > recipes. > > > On May 2, 12:07 pm, Joe Barnhart <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The wiki does not seem to have any momentum of its own. > > > > If we want to continue relying on three or four people (or one ;-) to > > > create all of the documentation for web2py, no action is needed. If, > > > on the other hand, we want to harness more work from advanced and > > > occasional users of web2py, this needs to be addressed. > > > > Massimo -- I went back and looked at the wiki pages and found little > > > information that has been added in the last six weeks. > > > > Web2py has so much going for it, yet it is predominantly the effort of > > > a single, highly-productive individual. We are not yet an open-source > > > community when we rely on the efforts of one person to write, debug, > > > enhance, support, and document the entire project. > > > > -- Joe B. > > > > On May 2, 10:28 am, dlypka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hopefully enough developers will join the effort to keep up with the > > > > scatter. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
