Yarko -- I can't say about others, but for me the key missing features in the wiki are:
* Wiki-style links and organization * Easy navigable URLs * More compact and usable layout All wikis I have used in the past use embedded WikiStyleTags to create links to other pages on the wiki, or even create stub pages automatically. Ours does not. It's linking is very cumbersome and more like a traditional web page. URLs in most wikis are related to the linked pages, so the page above might have a link of http://www.ourwiki.com/wikistyletags. It makes the page easily reachable and much more accessible than an automatically generated crypto-garf name. The layout of the current wiki is very large and diffuse. It feature enormous titles, big fonts, and just does not use space efficiently. I know it's a style thing, but style is important too. This is less important than the wiki features already mentioned, but it ranks somewhere. I don't want anyone to feel like I'm telling them what to do. I am just a messenger, bearing the bad news that we still do not have significant community involvement in solving our documentation dilemma. While I am becoming more proficient at reading Python ;-), I believe we need more accessible documentation if we are ever to take on Django or PHP. On May 2, 2:44 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: > talk is cheap... > > ...there is no shortage of opinions or advice on what "others should do", or > (worse) what "others should stop doing" (as I read this all)... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
